Skip to main content

Knots!

When you think of a knot, you may think of tying a string, rope, or shoe. But those knots are a little different than the mathematical knots we will be discussing today because those all have ends to the knot.

A knot defined in mathematical terms is a closed curve in a 3D space that doesn’t intersect itself. The knot I will be focusing on in this blog post is knot 8_18 (according to Rolfsen Knot table from The Knot Atlas). The 3D print of the knot looks like this.

We represent knots in a 2D space by drawing knot projections. One knot can have multiple projections, but here is the projection of the knot we will be working with.


(http://katlas.math.toronto.edu/wiki/8_18)

We can determine how many crossings a knot has by looking at its projection. A crossing is the place where a knot crosses itself in a knot projection. Therefore, this is an eight-crossing knot, hence why it is labeled knot 8_18. 

Now that we know the basic information for this knot, we will focus on determining the unknot number, a colorability, the writhe, and the first two steps of polynomial Q.  

A knot k has an unknotting number n if there is a projection of the knot where changing n crossings gives the unknot and no smaller number of crossings on any projection. To determine this, I started with my original knot projection and found a sequence of crossing switches, then performing Reidemeister moves until I found the unknot. I started switching the two crossings circled in red (original knot of the left and knot after switching on the right). This resulted in the unknotting number being two. You can see the flow of my work below.


 Next, we will look at colorabilty. A knot is 3-colorable if 1) each strand in the knot is giving one of three colors, 2) at each crossing either all three colors are present or all the colors are the same, and 3) at least two colors are used in the knot. This knot is 3-colorable because this criterion fits for all 8 crossings as seen below.

The steps to determine this successful colorabilty is choosing a color for the first strand and crossing. Starting in the top left with crossing one, I first choose blue for the top strand, then red and green for the other two strands (since all three colors need to be present). I then moved onto crossing four where blue was already present. So, I labeled the other two strands red and green. I continued this for the rest of the crossings, assigning three colors at each crossing or two strands had the same color, then keeping the third strand the same color (as seen in crossing six and eight) until the entire projection was colored. This resulted in a successful tri-colorable knot.

Next to determine the writhe of the knot, we first orientate the knot. You can see how the knot projections is orientated based on the arrows along each strand. Next, we assign a +1 and -1 to all crossing based on their direction of crossing. The assignments resulted in the following.

Finally, the writhe will be the sum of all these +1 and -1. The writhe of this knot projection is 0.

Finally, we will look at the first steps of solving for the polynomial Q using this equation.

Q(L) = (-A3) -w(L) P(L)

First, we need to determine P(L). Which can be solved by the following.



Then plug in P(L) and the writhe to Q to get the following.



If we were to continue these steps, we would keep going until it was reduced to projections that produced the unknot. However, this could be very many steps, so we will only look at the first two steps which resulted in four knots remaining. 

We now know more about the characteristics of this knot! 



 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Approximation of a Solid of Revolution

Most math teachers I've had have been able to break down Calculus into two very broad categories: derivatives and integrals. What is truly amazing, is how much you can do with these two tools. By using integration, it is possible to approximate the shape of a 2-D function that is rotated around an axis. This solid created from the rotation is known as a solid of revolution. To explain this concept, we will take a look at the region bounded by the two functions: \[ f(x) = 2^{.25x} - 1 \] and \[ g(x) = e^{.25x} - 1 \] bounded at the line y = 1. This region is meant to represent a cross section of a small bowl. While it may not perfectly represent this practical object, the approximation will be quite textured, and will provide insight into how the process works. The region bounded by the two functions can be rotated around the y-axis to create a fully solid object. This is easy enough to talk about, but what exactly does this new solid look like? Is...

Solids of Revolution Revisited

Introduction In my previous blog post on solids of revolution, we looked at the object formed by rotating the area between \(f(x) = -\frac{1}{9}x^2+\frac{3}{4} \) and \( g(x)=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}e^{-x} \) around the \( x \) axis and bounded by \( x = 0 \) and \( x = 1.5 \). When this solid is approximated using 10 washers, the resulting object looks like this: When I was looking back over the 3D prints I’d created for this course, I noticed that the print for this example was the least interesting of the bunch. Looking at the print now, I feel like the shape is rather uninteresting. The curve I chose has such a gradual slope that each of the washers are fairly similar in size and causes the overall shape to just look like a cylinder. Since calculating the changes in the radiuses of the washers is a big part of the washer method, I don’t think this slowly decreasing curve was the best choice to illustrate the concept. The reason I had done this o...

Finding the Center of Mass of a Toy Boat

Consider two people who visit the gym a substantial amount. One is a girl who loves to lift weights and bench press as much as she possibly can. The other is a guy who focuses much more on his legs, trying to break the world record for squat weight. It just so happens that these two are the same height and have the exact same weight, but the center of their weight is not in the same part of their body. This is because the girl has much more weight in the top half of her body and the boy has more weight in the bottom half. This difference in center of mass is a direct result of the different distributions of mass throughout both of their bodies. Moments and Mass There are two main components to finding the center of mass of an object. The first, unsurprisingly, is the mass of the whole object. In this case of the boat example, the mass will be uniform throughout the entire object. This is ideal a majority of the time as it drastically reduces the difficulty...