Skip to main content

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil

A ruled surface is a surface that consists straight lines, called rulings, which lie upon the surface. These surfaces are formed of a set of points that are "swept" by a straight line. This is relatively intuitive once you see a good visual, but can be a bit abstract without that concrete example. A very basic example of a ruled surface is a cylinder; if we have a straight line and move it in a circle we create a cylinder made entirely of straight line. Note that the surface will only be a cylinder if all the lines are parallel. If the lines are not parallel we can create hyperboloids and cones depending on how much we have rotated. The rotation we are describing here is not a simple turning action, but more of a twisting motion—less like rotating a can by turning it and more like wringing out a washcloth by twisting it. Specifically, a cylinder is essentially two circles connected by rulings, if we keep one of the circles stationary and rotate the other we create the twisting motion that creates cones and hyperboloids and if we rotate one of the circles 360° we get back to our original cylinder. These rotation of cylinder to hyperboloid to cone can be found below.

A cylinder is really a rather basic ruled surface; other more "interesting" surfaces do exist and can often be created relatively simply. For example, most planes are ruled surfaces as are many solids, even more unique surfaces like the Möbius strip (shown below) are ruled surfaces.

The surface we are going to be looking at is very similar to the Möbius strip which is the Trefoil knot, which is shown below.

This surface is parametrically defined by the following \[ x = sin(t) + 2sin(2t) \\ y = cos(t) -2cos(2t) \\ z = -sin(3t). \] In order to actually create the solid model of the trefoil knot ruled surface I created the outer edge with the above formulas and the inner edge by halving its size. This allowed the actual ruled surface of the trefoil knot to be easily visible. Furthermore, the rulings are also easily visible in the image below which is our 3D model of the trefoil knot ruled surface. The actual physical model is approximately 2"x2"x1".

When deciding a ruled surface to model I was immediately drawn to the Möbius strip which is a somewhat of a standard surface. As such I went on to explore similar surfaces, and landed on the trefoil knot. Interestingly, the trefoil knot can be considered a type of Möbius strip as it only has one side and one boundary strip. Additionally, later in the semester we will (I believe) have a discussion on knots and knot theory, so consider this a bit of a foretaste—or if we do not cover knots and not theory an exciting foray into knots, and it might also pique your interest in the Christian symbolism of the trefoil (or Trinity) knot.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Approximation of a Solid of Revolution

Most math teachers I've had have been able to break down Calculus into two very broad categories: derivatives and integrals. What is truly amazing, is how much you can do with these two tools. By using integration, it is possible to approximate the shape of a 2-D function that is rotated around an axis. This solid created from the rotation is known as a solid of revolution. To explain this concept, we will take a look at the region bounded by the two functions: \[ f(x) = 2^{.25x} - 1 \] and \[ g(x) = e^{.25x} - 1 \] bounded at the line y = 1. This region is meant to represent a cross section of a small bowl. While it may not perfectly represent this practical object, the approximation will be quite textured, and will provide insight into how the process works. The region bounded by the two functions can be rotated around the y-axis to create a fully solid object. This is easy enough to talk about, but what exactly does this new solid look like? Is...
8 comments
Read more

Solids of Revolution Revisited

Introduction In my previous blog post on solids of revolution, we looked at the object formed by rotating the area between \(f(x) = -\frac{1}{9}x^2+\frac{3}{4} \) and \( g(x)=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}e^{-x} \) around the \( x \) axis and bounded by \( x = 0 \) and \( x = 1.5 \). When this solid is approximated using 10 washers, the resulting object looks like this: When I was looking back over the 3D prints I’d created for this course, I noticed that the print for this example was the least interesting of the bunch. Looking at the print now, I feel like the shape is rather uninteresting. The curve I chose has such a gradual slope that each of the washers are fairly similar in size and causes the overall shape to just look like a cylinder. Since calculating the changes in the radiuses of the washers is a big part of the washer method, I don’t think this slowly decreasing curve was the best choice to illustrate the concept. The reason I had done this o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Finding the Center of Mass of a Toy Boat

Consider two people who visit the gym a substantial amount. One is a girl who loves to lift weights and bench press as much as she possibly can. The other is a guy who focuses much more on his legs, trying to break the world record for squat weight. It just so happens that these two are the same height and have the exact same weight, but the center of their weight is not in the same part of their body. This is because the girl has much more weight in the top half of her body and the boy has more weight in the bottom half. This difference in center of mass is a direct result of the different distributions of mass throughout both of their bodies. Moments and Mass There are two main components to finding the center of mass of an object. The first, unsurprisingly, is the mass of the whole object. In this case of the boat example, the mass will be uniform throughout the entire object. This is ideal a majority of the time as it drastically reduces the difficulty...
Post a Comment
Read more