Skip to main content

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html.

I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance.




What needed Improvement?

The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3].

After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print because some blocks would have negative volumes and some would have positive volumes. This caused some of the blocks to never touch because they only intersected at the corners, and all fell apart when I removed supports. It was as if, I printed floating blocks. This led me to change the domain, so that none of the individual prism volumes is below zero and all build up from a base and will have shared faces. I also think it would be beneficial to focus on a smaller portion of the function to provide a clear demonstration of the change in volume compared to my previous example that had a broad range and didn’t see much change.

The Improvement

To implement these improvements, I first adjusted the function to add and intercept, f(x) = cos(xy) +1. Then, I changed the domain to integrate on [0,3] x [0,3]. This allows for all the prisms to have a positive volume and build up from the base, so there will be no floating blocks. It also shows a single quadrant of the function to better show the volume change even though we know these volume changes occur similarly in all four quadrants. This resulted in a more accurate estimated volume compared to the actual volume, especially compared to my previous attempt. Below are my calculations to support these changes.

The estimated volume is 36.25 cubic units and represented in the table below. I used the top right corner of the prisms to calculate the individual prism volumes. 


The actual volume is 10.85 cubic unit which is solved by taking the double integral   


 






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...
Post a Comment
Read more