Skip to main content

Knot 10-84

Introduction

In mathematics, a knot is simply a closed loop. The simplest version of this is the unknot, which is a just a closed circle (imagine a ponytail holder). Knots, however, quickly become more complicated than this more basic example. This post will examine a particular knot (knot 10-84) and a few of its knot invariants.

Crossing Number

Knots are often defined by their crossing number, which is the number of times the knot’s strands cross each other. As indicated in its name, knot 10-84 is a 10 crossing knot. In order to visualize the knot, we can look at its knot projection, in which the knot is represented by a line segment broken only at its undercrossings:

Tricolorability

Now that we’ve looked at knot crossings, we will examine a potential property of knots: tricolorability. In order to understand tricolorability, it is first important to know that one strand of a knot is defined as an unbroken line segment in the knot projection. With this in mind, a knot is tricolorable when each strand can be assigned a color so that for every crossing the strands that meet there are either 1) all the same color, or 2) three separate colors. Additionally, the strands of the knot cannot all be given the same color.

A knot coloring was attempted on knot 10-84 by beginning at the upper right crossing and coloring all the strands meeting there blue. From there, a coloring could be achieved that respected the rules of tricolorability. Therefore, knot 10-84 is tricolorable.

Unknotting Number

The unknotting number of a knot is the least number of crossings that need to be switched in order to turn a knot into the unknot. It is difficult to find the exact knotting number because doing so requires testing many different crossing switches. However, we will demonstrate here that our knot can be “unknotted” with three switches. The switched crossings are circled in gray in the image below:

This means that 3 is an upper bound on our unknotting number. In order to prove that this was the actual unknotting number we would need to show that changing any 1 or 2 crossings would not unknot our knot. This would be time-consuming and thus we will not prove it (however, just by looking at the knot we can hypothesize that an unknotting may not be possible with only 2 or less switches).

Writhe

Writhe is another property of a knot that is achieved by assigning numerical values to the crossings. This is achieved by first assigning the knot an orientation- in other words, imagine the knot strand is a racetrack on which cars can travel in only one direction. Each crossing is assigned either +1 or -1 based on which orientation the crossings form:

The writhe of knot 10-84 was calculated by assigning it the orientation indicated by the yellow arrows. Then, the value of each crossing was determined as is indicated in the image. To calculate the writhe, the values of each of these crossings were added. As a result, the write of knot 10-84 was determined to be -4.

Knot Polynomial

The knot polynomial is a more complicated invariant of a knot to calculate, and thus will not be done in full. The polynomial is calculated by splitting crossings according to the following rules:

We will perform two crossing splits on knot 10-84. The crossing to split on was chosen arbitrarily. The change in the knot due to the first split is indicated in red. These two polynomials were each split one more time. The changes to the knot for the first polynomial are indicated in blue, while those for the second are indicated in green:

Next, we simplify the polynomial:

This knot has many crossings, so it would be a rather long process to fully reduce them. For this reason, we will stop here. The final step is to calculate the polynomial Q using the writhe calculated previously. This gives us the following equation for the knot polynomial \( Q \):

Conclusion

Now that we’ve found some of the invariants of knot 10-84, you’ve hopefully learned a little about knot theory and can find these invariants for other knots!

Author: Sarah Bombrys

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...
Post a Comment
Read more