Skip to main content

Knot 10-11

The knot I chose for this project was knot 10-11. That is the eleventh knot that has ten crossings. I picked it for no reason whatsoever. I 3D printed the knot as you can see here.
A knot's crossing number is the smallest number of crossings possible in a 2D representation of the knot. This knot's crossing number is 10. A knot's unknotting number is the smallest number of crossings flipped that will give you the unknot. I found an upper bound on the unknotting number. If you switch the crossings circled below, then the knot will become the unknot and therefore has an unknotting number of at most 3.
The colorability of a knot can help determine whether or not two knots are actually the same. When the number of crossings in a knot is high, it is actually pretty hard to know if two knots are secretly the same and are only represented differently through Reidemeister moves. Colorability can help confirm that two knots are indeed different. Colorability is the ability to have each knot segment designated with a number and to have each crossing have the quality that \((i+j-2k)\mod(n) = 0\) where \(i\) and \(j\) are the values of the segments being separated and \(k\) is the value of the segment on top of the other two. The value of \(n\) depends on what n-colorability is being determined. Colorability helps determine if two knots are the same because a knot's colorability is consistent no matter the representation it has in 2D. So if two knots have the same n-colorabilities, it is possible that they are the same knot, but if they have different n-colorabilities, they are definitely not the same knot. I tested to see if my knot was 3-colorable. When it comes to 3-colorability, you do not have to assign the segments numbers, as long as each crossing has three colors involved or only one color involved, and more than one color is used, the knot is 3-colorable.
The picture above displays my attempt at making my knot 3-colorable. The attempt was going well until the very end. I started by making the large segment on top red. Then, I continued coloring the segments making sure each crossing had three colors until the last white segment. It cannot be red, green, or blue because any one of those colors would cause one of the crossings to have only two colors present. The characteristic of not being 3-colorable means knot 10-11 is not any knot that is 3-colorable, like the trefoil knot.
  A knot is able to have an overall direction. Imagine arrows all pointing the same way as you continue along the knot. The writhe of a knot is the sum of the positive or negative values of its crossings. A crossing is either positive or negative depending on the direction the above and below parts of the crossings have. Assigning each crossing of knot 10-11 a value as pictured below and adding them up gives a writhe of -2.
Every knot has a Q polynomial assigned to it. To find the polynomial, you have to break down the knot by changing each crossing so that the two segments connect and do not cross anymore. There are two ways to connect segments, so you have to keep track of each knot made while breaking down your knot. A knot with 10 crossings has over 1000 knots when broken down, so I only did two steps of finding the knot polynomial. You can see the steps below.
Even though I chose my knot for absolutely no reason, I learned a lot about knot 10-11. Any time someone brings up the mathematically defined knot, I will think of knot 10-11 and its inability to be 3-colorable and the second step of the process to find its Q polynomial.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...
Post a Comment
Read more