Skip to main content

*Insert Knot-Based Pun Here*

 A knot is a closed loop which is a transformation of the circle into 3D space! Unlike a physical knot, a mathematical knot has no ends, and thus isn't tied and can't be untied. The fundamental knot is the circle, which is the unknot. 


For a knot more complex than the circle to be formed, the threads of the knot must be crossed a finite number of times. These can be undone through the Reidemeister moves, which move threads past each other. Certain operations do not change the not, and these create invariants of a knot. 


It cannot be trivially proven that a given knot is not actually a clever twist of the circle. Coloring the knot could reveal if a not is not the unknot. However, the failure of coloring a certain number of times does not always mean a knot is the unknot, as different starting points for the coloring may affect the outcome as well as using more colors. The simplest coloring is three-coloring. For this process, three colors are used and the threads of the knots are colored such that at least three colors are used, and that at every crossing either all three colors are present or only one color is present. 

Below I show an attempt at a three coloring of my knot, as well as my uncolored knot. I chose 10-47 which has a crossing number of 10 and is the 47th variation of the 10 crossing knot. 


Uncolored Knot


As circled, my 3-coloring failed! However. this does not mean it is the unknot. This failed because there was a crossing which had 2 colors present. The only options are at a crossing that all 3 colors must be present, or only one can be. 


My knot has a writhe of 4 given the orientation I define below. "Above" crossings are +1 while "negative" crossings have a value of -1, and the sum of the crossings gives the total writhe.







The writhe will change with the number of crossings, and how they are presented in the projection (2D representation, such as the images above). Using the python library, I decided to plot the writhes of the first 150 knots with 10 crossings, and the plot is shown below.


Interestingly, it appears that the writhe is somewhat cyclic! I assigned a value of -1 for knots pyknotid didn't have value for. The maximum writhe was 10 and the minimum was 0. It must attempt to orient the knots such that they have a maximal number of positive crossings. 


Additionally, every knot has an attribute known as its unknotting number. The unknotting number asserts the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to become the unknot. This is not trivial to see, and it is often more intuitive to present the upper bound of this number, since only an especially insightful mathematician could see the moves such that they will produce the minimum number. According to the knot atlas entry for 10-47, it has an unknotting number of 2! I have no Earthly idea of what processes they went through to obtain that, but I applaud their dedication. Below I present what I believe is an upper bound of this process as well as show the steps I took in order to obtain the unknot. 

I suggest that the upper bound of my unknotting number is 11, since it took 11 moves in order to arrive at the unknot. Surely, a more clever mathematician could reduce this much further since the minimal number is 2. Below I show my process










Finally, every knot has an associated polynomial! Below I give an expansion of the polynomial for my knot. 













Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Approximation of a Solid of Revolution

Most math teachers I've had have been able to break down Calculus into two very broad categories: derivatives and integrals. What is truly amazing, is how much you can do with these two tools. By using integration, it is possible to approximate the shape of a 2-D function that is rotated around an axis. This solid created from the rotation is known as a solid of revolution. To explain this concept, we will take a look at the region bounded by the two functions: \[ f(x) = 2^{.25x} - 1 \] and \[ g(x) = e^{.25x} - 1 \] bounded at the line y = 1. This region is meant to represent a cross section of a small bowl. While it may not perfectly represent this practical object, the approximation will be quite textured, and will provide insight into how the process works. The region bounded by the two functions can be rotated around the y-axis to create a fully solid object. This is easy enough to talk about, but what exactly does this new solid look like? Is...
8 comments
Read more

Solids of Revolution Revisited

Introduction In my previous blog post on solids of revolution, we looked at the object formed by rotating the area between \(f(x) = -\frac{1}{9}x^2+\frac{3}{4} \) and \( g(x)=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}e^{-x} \) around the \( x \) axis and bounded by \( x = 0 \) and \( x = 1.5 \). When this solid is approximated using 10 washers, the resulting object looks like this: When I was looking back over the 3D prints I’d created for this course, I noticed that the print for this example was the least interesting of the bunch. Looking at the print now, I feel like the shape is rather uninteresting. The curve I chose has such a gradual slope that each of the washers are fairly similar in size and causes the overall shape to just look like a cylinder. Since calculating the changes in the radiuses of the washers is a big part of the washer method, I don’t think this slowly decreasing curve was the best choice to illustrate the concept. The reason I had done this o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Finding the Center of Mass of a Toy Boat

Consider two people who visit the gym a substantial amount. One is a girl who loves to lift weights and bench press as much as she possibly can. The other is a guy who focuses much more on his legs, trying to break the world record for squat weight. It just so happens that these two are the same height and have the exact same weight, but the center of their weight is not in the same part of their body. This is because the girl has much more weight in the top half of her body and the boy has more weight in the bottom half. This difference in center of mass is a direct result of the different distributions of mass throughout both of their bodies. Moments and Mass There are two main components to finding the center of mass of an object. The first, unsurprisingly, is the mass of the whole object. In this case of the boat example, the mass will be uniform throughout the entire object. This is ideal a majority of the time as it drastically reduces the difficulty...
Post a Comment
Read more