Skip to main content

Do Over: Integral over Regions in the Plane

Have you ever completed a project, turn it in, and then immediately think of all the ways you could have improved upon it and you wish you could just do it over? Well, I was able to do just that. When creating a model that demonstrates how integrating over the region of a plane works, there are many routes you can take. I decided to make an approximation of what was essentially the volume of half a cone. I thought it was sufficient in showcasing how approximating the value of an integral works, but I knew I was limited by my tools. I had to manually create each rectangular prism that made up the approximation, which was kinda boring to be honest. It was so boring, that I only did the minimum number neccessary. I knew it would be more interesting if the approximation was made up of hundreds of prisms. That way, it would be more accurate to the real integral, but you could still see that it was an approximation. I wanted to do something like that, but I was not about to spend hours making rectangles for my weekly homework.
  The idea of making hundreds of prisms became a reality when I was introduced to OpenSCAD. With OpenSCAD, I could write ten lines of code, click a button, and boom. Hundreds of rectangular prisms right before my eyes. And that's exactly what I did for my do over project. Adding more rectangles wasn't the only improvement I made for this project. My original cone only grew in size as you move up the \(y\) axis. I wanted to have an integration over an area whose value doesn't just increase as you move in one direction. So, I introduced sine waves to the function. This way, the value of the function goes up and down as you go in any direction. The function being integrated for this project is \(f(x,y) = 3+\sin(x)+\sin(y)\).
Now, which object looks cooler? A blob of rectangles that you can't even tell is supposed to be a cone, or the area full of hills and valleys made from over a thousand rectangular prisms? Personally, I'd say the latter. I made the redo multichromatic so that you can see the hills easier. Ultimately, the increase in rectangular prisms and the change of function really improve this project in displaying the value of an integral over an area.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Approximation of a Solid of Revolution

Most math teachers I've had have been able to break down Calculus into two very broad categories: derivatives and integrals. What is truly amazing, is how much you can do with these two tools. By using integration, it is possible to approximate the shape of a 2-D function that is rotated around an axis. This solid created from the rotation is known as a solid of revolution. To explain this concept, we will take a look at the region bounded by the two functions: \[ f(x) = 2^{.25x} - 1 \] and \[ g(x) = e^{.25x} - 1 \] bounded at the line y = 1. This region is meant to represent a cross section of a small bowl. While it may not perfectly represent this practical object, the approximation will be quite textured, and will provide insight into how the process works. The region bounded by the two functions can be rotated around the y-axis to create a fully solid object. This is easy enough to talk about, but what exactly does this new solid look like? Is...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...

Middle of Mass Measured from Moment

The center of mass of an object is the point that lies in the average position of mass in that object. For a normal polygon, that point is in the middle of the shape. However, if the shape is irregular, has concave angles, or has holes, the center of mass can be far from the middle of the object. Two things come into factor when determining the center of mass of an object. Weight and distance. Obviously, if one side of an object has more mass than the other, the center of mass will be on the heavier side. But, distance plays a role, too. If two sides of an object have the same mass, but one is farther from the middle, the center of mass will be on the side that has farther mass. Multiplying both of these factors together gives the moment of an object. Dividing the moment by the overall mass gives the location of the center of mass.   The reason I chose my shape is to mimic how those toy balancing birds work. The toy is a model bird with its wings outstretched. The ...