Skip to main content

Do Over: Ambiguous Object's

For our redo assignment, I decided to go on and visit our most recent assignment, over Ambiguous objects. I felt that my print did not fully capture what I wanted from and really wanted to find one that was better. When coming up with my first one, I went through many different designs, so here I went back to the one that my gut told me would be better but I decided not to listen sadly.

The big change I made was to not construct my object with four different functions for each side. This just caused for confusion when trying to troubleshoot, as well as explaining since it depended on which side you looked at. Moreover, I wanted to drop the regular polygons all together. There are a couple of ways to make really interesting Ambiguous objects out of regular polygons, but that just was not what I wanted to focus on anymore. To me, it did not really go into the theme of objects appears to be different from different observers.

My Do Over:
First Perspective:

Second Perspective:

Overall Shape From Above:


This is my new Ambiguous object! It looks very different from last time, and looks so much interesting in my opinion! Here, both functions were giving the $x$ parameterizaion of just $\cos{x}$ as this gave us some nice curvature. The more interesting part is the $y$ coordinates from both directions! The first perspective was shown with the function: $f(x) = \cos{x} + .25*\sin{x}^2$. This function, from a local perspective, is very similar to the curve $x^2$ which is a bit easier to identify, they you can see this on the object with this almost only curved side!

Now, the part I really liked, was the function for the other perspective. It is given by the function $g(x) = -.5\cos{3*x}*\sin{x}$. On the side that the observer would see this function, it looks like a pair of glasses with these little loops! I thoroughly enjoyed this because the opposite side observer's perspective is nothing like this!

Overall, I am very happy with this object's shape and how it has turned out. I wished I had listened to my gut, but in the end it is better to try something than to never try at all!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...