Do-Over: Integration Over Regions in the Plane

How I chose which project to repeat and what needs fixed

Over the course of the semester, I've learned a lot about not only explaining math but also the logistics of printing a helpful 3D model. In many of my calculus courses, professors have stood at the chalkboard and tried to draw a 3D object, only for the students to be more confused than before the visual aid was added. When I thought about which project to do again, I tried thinking of a project where my print was difficult to visualize and only made the topic more confusing. My integration over regions in the plane project came to mind.

Originally, I picked the function \(f(x, y) = \frac{1}{3}(x^2)(2y)\) on the plane bounded by \(y = e^{x-5}\) and \(y = ln(x)+5\) from [0, 7] x [0, 7]. This function grows very quickly, which was seen on my model because I picked such a large rectangular region. The print was very tall and super skinny. It was difficult to see the rectangles of the approximation because of this.

To fix this issue, I can do one of two things: 1) I can have the rectangular region enclosed by [0, 1] x [0, 1] so that the steps between x- and y-values are not so drastic, or 2) I can pick a new function. If I make the rectangular region smaller, you will no longer be able to see the shape of the domain, below.

Therefore, I am going to pick a function that does not grow as quickly over the same domain. This way, you'll be able to compare the original function to a better function and how in this new case you can see the details I originally intended for you to see much clearer. (I wanted the domain to have a leaf-like shape for fall, which I still want to celebrate Taylor Swift's new album.)

How I implemented the improvements

I started implementing these changes by first finding a slow-growing function of two variables that wasn't too basic. I ended up choosing \(f(x,y)=\frac{10}{2x+y}\).

As you can see, this function fixes my huge growth issue over the chosen region, and we can still see the shape of the domain. It may be on the less-interesting side of things, but any fancy functions with exponentials, etc. were not great for printing. Here is the model using the rectangular approximation method and right-hand endpoints:

As you can see, the steps are not as extreme, which was my goal. I think this model does a much better job at helping students visualize a rectangular approximation, given you can actually see the rectangles this time. My print is going to be blown up to have about a 3.5 x 3.5 inch base so that you can see everything as clearly as possible.

Word count: 468

Comments

Do Over: Double Integrals over Regions

Introduction Over the semester we've looked at many topics and created 3D models. For this we are going to revisit an old topic, double integrals over a region. In this we found the volume of a surface in the xyz-plane bounded by two curves. From the many topics I chose to revisit this topic. I have a couple reason to why I chose to redo this. First, the model did not print correctly. The print added spaces between the rectangular prisms. Another reason was that I think the surface and curves did not represent the topic entirely. The surface I chose just increased between the curves. Improvements When making the model on Onshape there were no spaces between the rectangles, which can be seen on the right. However, when printing this spaces were being added. The second issue was with the surface I chose which was \(f(x,y)=xy+x\). This function only increased over the two curves I chose \begin{align*} f(x) &= \sqrt{x} ...

The Septoil Knot

Knots are a very interesting topic and a field that has not quite been fully discovered, so mathematicians are still discovering new ideas and invariances about knots even today. While it may seem like knots are a simple skill you learn at camp, they actually have a lot of mathematical properties and in this blog post we are going to look at just a few. By mathematical definition, a knot is a closed curve in three dimensional space that does not intersect itself. Since we are working with three dimensional space and you are reading this on a two dimensional screen, we need a way to look at knots in two dimensions and that is where knot projections come in. A knot projection is simply a picture of a knot in two dimensions and where a knot crosses itself in the projection is simply a crossing of that projection. The number of crossings of a knot is the smallest number of crossings among all projections of a knot. Since a knot is not necessarily solid, one...

Knot 10-84

Introduction In mathematics, a knot is simply a closed loop. The simplest version of this is the unknot, which is a just a closed circle (imagine a ponytail holder). Knots, however, quickly become more complicated than this more basic example. This post will examine a particular knot (knot 10-84) and a few of its knot invariants. Crossing Number Knots are often defined by their crossing number, which is the number of times the knot’s strands cross each other. As indicated in its name, knot 10-84 is a 10 crossing knot. In order to visualize the knot, we can look at its knot projection, in which the knot is represented by a line segment broken only at its undercrossings: Tricolorability Now that we’ve looked at knot crossings, we will examine a potential property of knots: tricolorability. In order to understand tricolorability, it is first important to know that one strand of a knot is defined as an unbroken line segment in the knot p...

MA 391 Composition and Communication

Search This Blog