Skip to main content

Ambiguous Objects using Mathematical Functions

 Ambiguous: open to more than one interpretation; having a double meaning (according to the Oxford Dictionary). You typically use this adjective in an English or art class rather than a math class because literature and artwork can sometimes have multiple meanings or viewpoints. But not math. Two plus two is always four. The square root of nine is always three. And a function always results in that specific graph. I think that’s why I’ve always had a certain liking to math because it was always direct and to the point with not a lot of room for interpretation. However, by this week’s project, my mind has been blown by the ability to use math functions to create an ambiguous object.

Before we get into the math for the object, I’d also like to point out a real-world example of ambiguous objects, optical illusions. They use the same method that we are going to use by find a shared visual point or line that forces the audience to view one thing or the other. Have you ever been left starting at an optical illusion wondering why you can’t see both options? That’s why.

The goal of this ambiguous object is to view the object from one side to see one function, then view it from the other side to view the other function. But how does that work? We are going to use two functions, their parameterization, and perspective to build this ambiguous object.

First, we start with our two parameterized curves.

 







 






Observer 1 thinks they will see and observer 2 thinks they will see . We assume that each view will be looking at the object at a 45-degree angle and far enough away to treat the entire curve as a specific point. We assume the parameterization of these curves, r(t), will give the floating curve which will allow the object to be seen differently from the two different perspectives. Let’s find an expression for r(t) for the floating curve that will combine the two points of vision for these curves.

We will need to find the equation ra(s) through and parallel to <0,1,1> and the parameterization. We will also need to find the same thing for the second curve; the equation rb(t) through and parallel to <0,-1,1> . The results are and .

We now set these equations equal to each other and solve for the point of intersection.

Then plug s and t back into the parameterizations and get our final parameterization of the floating curve. This will represent our top curve and will form each function depending on the viewpoint.

We continue to build the function into and object.

If you look, you can see what function each observer’s perspective will see. Observer one will see the curve for f(x).


Observer 2 will see the curve for g(x). 


(Note: the rectangle at the bottom is used as a platform for the object and tells the observers to always view it from the longer side.)

I chose this object and these functions because I enjoy working with trig functions as they always surprise me with the different curves they can make. I also wanted to see how two completely different curves would show in a 3D object and how distinct they will be for each viewer. For example, one curve has distinct directional changes and is duplicated in all four quadrants, while the other curve is a single line function. 




 


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...
Post a Comment
Read more