Skip to main content

Finding an object's center of mass using integration

Thinking about center of mass

As a kid, I would sit in class and balance my pencil on my finger. What I didn't know then was that I was finding the pencil's center of mass. An object's center of mass is a point where the average weight of the object lies. In other words, the weighted position vectors of the object at this point sum to zero (source: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/center-of-mass).
The exact location of this point can be found using calculus.

First, it is important to understand the moment. The moment for a two-dimensional object is given with respect to both the x- and y-axes. It is a physical characteristic of the object a certain distance from these axes. It's easiest to think about the axes as reference points for where the characteristic acts; in this case, where the mass is distributed.

When computing these moments, the hardest concept to grasp is that the moment with respect to y, for example, is given by the x-coordinates of the object. These coordinates are how far away it is from the y-axis. As for the moment with respect to x, we use the y-coordinates for how far away it is. This concept is illustrated below:
For more information on moments, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_(physics)#:~:text=The%20concept%20of%20moment%20in%20physics%20is%20derived,to%20an%20arm%2C%20a%20beam%20of%20some%20sort.

When there are more than just point masses, things get trickier to compute! For our purposes, we will use laminas of constant density \(\rho\). The moment with respect to y is given as follows: \[My=\int_{a}^{b} \rho*x*f(x) dx\] Then, the moment with respect to x is: \[Mx=\int_{c}^{d} \rho*y*g(y) dy\] The last thing we will need to compute the center of mass is the mass of the object given by: \[M=\int_{a}^{b} \rho*f(x) dx\] The center of mass is reported as a coordinate (x, y), where x and y are \((\frac{My}{mass}, \frac{Mx}{mass})\). It's important to note that the constant \(\rho\) in each integral will cancel when the moments are divided by the mass, so its value is irrelevant as long as it is constant.

Computing the center of mass

For an example, consider the following:
As you can see, the moment with respect to y is zero. This is to be expected because the object is symmetric across the y-axis. The most noteworthy thing is that the center of mass indicated by a red star is outside of the object! This makes the example interesting because despite symmetry across the y-axis, the object's center of mass is not in the middle of it.

Why I chose this solid

I chose this example because of its interesting center of mass. Additionally, when I was first thinking of an object, I thought of the coins we made for our first assignment. I thought a disk would be a good choice, and especially a disk with a piece missing. However, I did not want to print another coin. I settled for a half of a disk with the center removed. It has a width of 1 cm from r = 3 cm to r = 4 cm. It is 0.1 cm thick.

A similar problem was on an old exam from MA 213, but it was asking for the area. I wanted to further apply it to center of mass because I understood the problem then and wanted to take my work from three years ago and build off of what I learned. When I learned Calc III, I remember polar coordinates being my favorite topic. They made integrating disks very straightforward, so hopefully it's easiest to understand this example in terms of polar coordinates, too.

For a review of polar coordinates, I used APEX Calculus, a free online calculus textbook, section 9.4.
Hartman, Gregory and Department of Mathematics, University of North Dakota, "APEX Calculus: UND Edition" (2017). Open Educational Resources. 2. https://commons.und.edu/oers/2

Word count: 588

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...