Skip to main content

Finding an object's center of mass using integration

Thinking about center of mass

As a kid, I would sit in class and balance my pencil on my finger. What I didn't know then was that I was finding the pencil's center of mass. An object's center of mass is a point where the average weight of the object lies. In other words, the weighted position vectors of the object at this point sum to zero (source: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/center-of-mass).
The exact location of this point can be found using calculus.

First, it is important to understand the moment. The moment for a two-dimensional object is given with respect to both the x- and y-axes. It is a physical characteristic of the object a certain distance from these axes. It's easiest to think about the axes as reference points for where the characteristic acts; in this case, where the mass is distributed.

When computing these moments, the hardest concept to grasp is that the moment with respect to y, for example, is given by the x-coordinates of the object. These coordinates are how far away it is from the y-axis. As for the moment with respect to x, we use the y-coordinates for how far away it is. This concept is illustrated below:
For more information on moments, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_(physics)#:~:text=The%20concept%20of%20moment%20in%20physics%20is%20derived,to%20an%20arm%2C%20a%20beam%20of%20some%20sort.

When there are more than just point masses, things get trickier to compute! For our purposes, we will use laminas of constant density \(\rho\). The moment with respect to y is given as follows: \[My=\int_{a}^{b} \rho*x*f(x) dx\] Then, the moment with respect to x is: \[Mx=\int_{c}^{d} \rho*y*g(y) dy\] The last thing we will need to compute the center of mass is the mass of the object given by: \[M=\int_{a}^{b} \rho*f(x) dx\] The center of mass is reported as a coordinate (x, y), where x and y are \((\frac{My}{mass}, \frac{Mx}{mass})\). It's important to note that the constant \(\rho\) in each integral will cancel when the moments are divided by the mass, so its value is irrelevant as long as it is constant.

Computing the center of mass

For an example, consider the following:
As you can see, the moment with respect to y is zero. This is to be expected because the object is symmetric across the y-axis. The most noteworthy thing is that the center of mass indicated by a red star is outside of the object! This makes the example interesting because despite symmetry across the y-axis, the object's center of mass is not in the middle of it.

Why I chose this solid

I chose this example because of its interesting center of mass. Additionally, when I was first thinking of an object, I thought of the coins we made for our first assignment. I thought a disk would be a good choice, and especially a disk with a piece missing. However, I did not want to print another coin. I settled for a half of a disk with the center removed. It has a width of 1 cm from r = 3 cm to r = 4 cm. It is 0.1 cm thick.

A similar problem was on an old exam from MA 213, but it was asking for the area. I wanted to further apply it to center of mass because I understood the problem then and wanted to take my work from three years ago and build off of what I learned. When I learned Calc III, I remember polar coordinates being my favorite topic. They made integrating disks very straightforward, so hopefully it's easiest to understand this example in terms of polar coordinates, too.

For a review of polar coordinates, I used APEX Calculus, a free online calculus textbook, section 9.4.
Hartman, Gregory and Department of Mathematics, University of North Dakota, "APEX Calculus: UND Edition" (2017). Open Educational Resources. 2. https://commons.und.edu/oers/2

Word count: 588

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...