Skip to main content

Solids of Revolution: The Shells Method

When calculating the area under a curve, it's easy to split the curve up into slices. These slices are roughly rectangular, and the approximate area can be found by the summation of length times height for each rectangle. If there are two curves, the area between them is simply the area under the top curve minus the area under the bottom curve. This works for two dimensions in the x- and y-planes, but it gets more complicated if these curves get wrapped around an axis and into three dimensions (the z-plane). It is best to visualize the area between two curves in three dimensions as washers or shells.

Take, for example, the curves \[y=25-(x-5)^2 \] and \[ y=(x-5)^2-25 \] wrapped around the y-axis. As seen in the picture, this is a good function to teach with because each of the ten layers on the 3D model coorespond to a whole number on the graph. It's easier for beginners to visualize whole numbers rather than fractions.
The area of this solid of revolution can be found by taking the following integral:

\[ 2pi\int_{0}^{10} (25-(x-5)^2)^2-((x-5)^2-25)^2 dx=(1000/3)*2pi=2094.39 \]
Here, the bounds are where the two curves intersect at 0 and 10. The integral is still the top curve minus the bottom curve; the only difference is that it is multiplied by 2pi to account for the revolution. As seen in the picture, this example was chosen because of its symmetry across the x-axis. This means that another way to calculate the area enclosed by these two parabolas is to take double the area under the first curve bounded by the x-axis as follows:

\[ 4pi\int_{0}^{10} (25-(x-5)^2)^2 dx=(1000/3)*2pi=2094.39 \]
In three dimensions, the rectanglar slices will appear as shells. At x = 1, 2, ... , 10, each shell is a hollowed-out cyclinder. The distinction between viewing these rectangles as shells wrapped around the y-axis instead of washers is that each shell has a constant width. (Washers, on the other hand, would have constant height.) This is depicted in the printed model. Again, because of the symmetry in this example, the model is split into top and bottom halves. This split depicts the x-axis, and we can take the part above and compare it to the part below to see that they are the same. In this model, each shell has a width of 0.2 cm. On the pictured graph, each x- and y-value has been scaled down by 1/5 for the model to give a radius of 1.8 cm and a height of 5 cm for each half. Note that the tenth shell is not visible because it has height zero using right-hand endpoints.

If approximating the area of a solid of revolution using the hollowed-out cylinders called "shells", we can take the equation for the volume of that cylinder and subtract from each shell the volume of a cylinder of the same height with radius r-1. This calculation is pictured for the first two shells. For this example, right-hand endpoints are used.

By taking the sums of the volumes of each shell, the approximated area is 2780.36 units squared. This is close(ish) to the actual value of 2094.39 units squared.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...