Skip to main content

Knot 8_18

The knot I chose: "8_18".
It is called 8_18 because it has 8 crossings and is the 18th knot on the knot table with 8 crossings.

Picture of my knot (from http://katlas.math.toronto.edu/wiki/8_18)


Crossing number: 8; the smallest number of crossings of any diagram with this knot is eight.

Sequence of crossing switches that gives the unknot (upper bound on the unknotting number):

An unknotting number is the number of changes you can make at intersections by changing which line is over or under at that intersection which at the end of all the changes gives you the unknot, or a simple loop with no knots in it. Basically you can change which line is over and which line is under at each intersection without sacrificing the integrity of the knot by cutting it in any way and the number of crossings you have to alter that give you the unknot becomes the upper bound of the unknotting number because there could be a simpler way to do it that requires less steps. A more formal definition is:

"We can immediately give simple bounds on this. For any n–crossing projection of a knot, the length of any maximum knotted switching sequence will be less than or equal to n. The unknotting number of a knot is the minimum number of crossings that need to be switched to produce the unknot, considered over all projections. So the length of a maximum knotted switching sequence of any projection of a knot must be at least one less than the knot’s unknotting number. Also, if a projection of a knot with n crossings has a knotted switching sequence of length n−1, it has a full sequence. After n−1 switches, exactly one crossing will be unswitched, and as the original knot must have been knotted, its mirror will be as well, so that last crossing may also be switched, creating a full sequence." (http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/VIGRE/VIGRE2008/REUPapers/Milnor.pdf)

My unknotting number: 3 (shown below with notes on notability)
The top loop goes through the bottom loop, untwists, goes over the top where it was and engulfs and untwists the remaining loops giving you just a circle or the unknot. The actual unknotting number: 2 (from http://katlas.math.toronto.edu/wiki/8_18)

I attempt a coloring. The rules of coloring a knot are 1. At least two colors must be used, and 2. At each crossing, the three incident strands are either all the same color or all different colors.
Due to all colors being the same or different at each crossing this colorability shows that the 8_18 knot is tricolorable. In fact, it has 4 fundamnetally distinct tricolorabilities which is pretty cool and I'm glad I found one of them.

Computing the writhe of my knot. A writhe is simply the sum of all its crossings. How do you assign numbers to crossings in a knot? Well, for every over-under crossing with the over pointing to the top right and the bottom line being pointed to the top left it is assigned a value of positive one. For every crossing where the top line points to the top left and the bottom line points to the top right is is a minus one. The writhe is the sum of all these numbers assigned to each crossing. See below image from (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writhe) for more details.
When I look at knot 8_18 and compute the +1's and -1's, I get the wraithe to be 0 with 4 negative one crossings and 4 positive one crossings.


The first two steps of the polynomial Q.
The Alxander Polynomial for this knot is \[-t^3+5t^2-10t+13-10t^-1+5t^-2-t^-3\].

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Finding an object's center of mass using integration

Thinking about center of mass As a kid, I would sit in class and balance my pencil on my finger. What I didn't know then was that I was finding the pencil's center of mass. An object's center of mass is a point where the average weight of the object lies. In other words, the weighted position vectors of the object at this point sum to zero (source: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/center-of-mass ). The exact location of this point can be found using calculus. First, it is important to understand the moment . The moment for a two-dimensional object is given with respect to both the x- and y-axes. It is a physical characteristic of the object a certain distance from these axes. It's easiest to think about the axes as reference points for where the characteristic acts; in this case, where the mass is distributed. When computing these moments, the hardest concept to grasp is that the moment with respect to y, for example, is given by the x-coordinat...

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...