Skip to main content

Trigonometric Ambiguity

In the second dimension, two different curves could never be portrayed as one curve yet still be observed separately. If one has a different \(y\) value at a certain \(x\), then there's no way they can be portrayed as one curve. This changes when you add another dimension, though. In the second dimension, the only way perspective can change is by rotating the plane, translating the plane, or making the plane smaller. These perspective changes don't make the curve any different though. A perspective change in the third dimension, however, can make a curve look drastically different. A circle in the \(xy\) plane looks like a circle when looking in the \(z\) direction. When looking in the \(x\) or \(y\) direction, though, a circle would look like a straight line. This kind of property enables us to make one curve look like two different curves depending on the perspective. The two perspectives we will be observing our curve from are orthogonal to the \(yz\) plane and the \(-yz\) plane. Now, we know that it's possible to make one curve look like two curves, but how do we do it? Well, we first take two curves in the \(xy\) plane and parameterize them. We need to make sure that their \(x\) values are the same. If your curve can be portrayed as a function of one variable, then just make the \(x\) value for both parameterizations \(t\). Because both curves are in the \(xy\) plane and their \(x\) values are the same, the only difference is their \(y\) values. Now, we make the parameterization for an entirely new curve. This new curve will still have the same \(x\) value as the other two curves. Its \(y\) and \(z\) values are new, though. If the \(y\) value in one of the curves is \(f(t)\) and the \(y\) value in the other curve is \(g(t)\), then the \(y\) value in the new curve is \(\frac{f(t)+g(t)}{2}\) and the \(z\) value is \(\frac{f(t)-g(t)}{2}\). Now, when we look at this curve at a 45 degree angle, we see either \(f(x)\) or \(g(x)\). The two curves become one in the third dimension.
  The two curves I chose to make one curve from are \(\sin(x)\) and \(\sin(x)-\cos(x)\). In order to make the two curves into a closed shape, the curves were rotated 180 degrees. The parameterization of the two curves are \([t, \sin(t), 0]\) and \([t, \sin(t)-\cos(t), 0]\). The parameterization of the new curve is \([t, \sin(t) - \frac{\cos(t)}{2}, \frac{\cos(t)}{2}]\). I chose these two curves to demonstrate how a concave shape and a convex shape can both be observed from one curve.
The two pictures above demonstrate how the curve looks different depending on the perspective. It could be considered an illusion made from math. The illusion is based on the fact that if you flattened out the curve in the plane orthogonal to your perspective, the resulting curve is one of the original curves we made the object with. For the print, in order to know where to look at the curve from, a shell was built underneath the curve to keep it oriented properly. I also made plates besides the object to show what the curve is supposed to look like from that perspective. The curve observed from above looks like a combination of the two original curves.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil A ruled surface is a surface that consists straight lines, called rulings, which lie upon the surface. These surfaces are formed of a set of points that are "swept" by a straight line. This is relatively intuitive once you see a good visual, but can be a bit abstract without that concrete example. A very basic example of a ruled surface is a cylinder; if we have a straight line and move it in a circle we create a cylinder made entirely of straight line. Note that the surface will only be a cylinder if all the lines are parallel. If the lines are not parallel we can create hyperboloids and cones depending on how much we have rotated. The rotation we are describing here is not a simple turning action, but more of a twisting motion—less like rotating a can by turning it and more like wringing out a washcloth by twisting it. Specifically, a cylinder is essentially two circles connected by rulings, if we keep one of the circles...
Post a Comment
Read more