Skip to main content

Solids of Revolution Revisited

Introduction

In my previous blog post on solids of revolution, we looked at the object formed by rotating the area between \(f(x) = -\frac{1}{9}x^2+\frac{3}{4} \) and \( g(x)=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}e^{-x} \) around the \( x \) axis and bounded by \( x = 0 \) and \( x = 1.5 \). When this solid is approximated using 10 washers, the resulting object looks like this:

When I was looking back over the 3D prints I’d created for this course, I noticed that the print for this example was the least interesting of the bunch. Looking at the print now, I feel like the shape is rather uninteresting. The curve I chose has such a gradual slope that each of the washers are fairly similar in size and causes the overall shape to just look like a cylinder. Since calculating the changes in the radiuses of the washers is a big part of the washer method, I don’t think this slowly decreasing curve was the best choice to illustrate the concept. The reason I had done this originally was because I hadn’t realized you could add supports to the print, and so I wanted to avoid printing anything that would have an overhang. Now that I have a lot more experience with 3D printing, I am going to alter this example to fix these issues.

A New Example

To revise my example, I want to change the outside curve to something that changes directions, which will make the outside of the object much more exciting. I don’t want to use any trigonometric curves that would be difficult to integrate, so instead I’ve decided to use the 3rd degree polynomial, \( f(x)=x^3-4x^2+4x+1 \).

I considered whether or not to change the function for the inner radius as well, which was also a fairly unexciting curve. Ultimately, I decided to keep the same equation (although I did need to scale it fit my new boundaries) because together the resulting solid of revolution looked like a flower vase. Something I’d really liked about my original item was that it looked like a real world object (I compared it to a piece of candy), so I wanted to make sure that my new object still had some sort of application. I want it to look interesting while still having the appearance of an everyday object- in this case, a flower vase.

As a result, I ended up using the following curves on the interval \( 0\le x\le2.5 \) for my new example:

The resulting print is shown below and is much more eye-catching than my original. I think that this change made the object a much better representation of the washer method as well. The washer method can calculate the volume of so many different solids, so I think it is much more fitting for it to be demonstrated through a less boring example.

Author: Sarah Bombrys

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Double Integrals over Regions

Introduction Over the semester we've looked at many topics and created 3D models. For this we are going to revisit an old topic, double integrals over a region. In this we found the volume of a surface in the xyz-plane bounded by two curves. From the many topics I chose to revisit this topic. I have a couple reason to why I chose to redo this. First, the model did not print correctly. The print added spaces between the rectangular prisms. Another reason was that I think the surface and curves did not represent the topic entirely. The surface I chose just increased between the curves. Improvements When making the model on Onshape there were no spaces between the rectangles, which can be seen on the right. However, when printing this spaces were being added. The second issue was with the surface I chose which was \(f(x,y)=xy+x\). This function only increased over the two curves I chose \begin{align*} f(x) &= \sqrt{x} ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Septoil Knot

Knots are a very interesting topic and a field that has not quite been fully discovered, so mathematicians are still discovering new ideas and invariances about knots even today. While it may seem like knots are a simple skill you learn at camp, they actually have a lot of mathematical properties and in this blog post we are going to look at just a few. By mathematical definition, a knot is a closed curve in three dimensional space that does not intersect itself. Since we are working with three dimensional space and you are reading this on a two dimensional screen, we need a way to look at knots in two dimensions and that is where knot projections come in. A knot projection is simply a picture of a knot in two dimensions and where a knot crosses itself in the projection is simply a crossing of that projection. The number of crossings of a knot is the smallest number of crossings among all projections of a knot. Since a knot is not necessarily solid, one...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knot 10-84

Introduction In mathematics, a knot is simply a closed loop. The simplest version of this is the unknot, which is a just a closed circle (imagine a ponytail holder). Knots, however, quickly become more complicated than this more basic example. This post will examine a particular knot (knot 10-84) and a few of its knot invariants. Crossing Number Knots are often defined by their crossing number, which is the number of times the knot’s strands cross each other. As indicated in its name, knot 10-84 is a 10 crossing knot. In order to visualize the knot, we can look at its knot projection, in which the knot is represented by a line segment broken only at its undercrossings: Tricolorability Now that we’ve looked at knot crossings, we will examine a potential property of knots: tricolorability. In order to understand tricolorability, it is first important to know that one strand of a knot is defined as an unbroken line segment in the knot p...
Post a Comment
Read more