Skip to main content

Minimal Surfaces

Minimal surfaces are almost exactly as they sound, it is the surface that minimizes the area around it. Think back to when you were younger, and you learned about area and surface area in math class. The methods you learned then were set equations for area, but the goal then was not to minimize the surface. Now, as we get more complex, and we want to cover as much surface as we can with as little material as possible and the way we accomplish this is with minimal surfaces.

Many people have attempted to explain minimal surfaces and how they work over the past several hundred years, but personally, one idea makes the most sense to me and is the easiest to understand. It is the idea that, in order to be considered a minimal surface, the mean curvature at every point on the surface must equal 0. And if you think it through, it makes perfect sense. If the mean curvature is zero, that means all of the curves balance each other out and when the area is taken, there won't be any extra space for the area to take up, hence a minimal surface.

Now you may need a refresher on how to calculate curvature. The equation for curvature is as follows:

k = T ' ( t ) r ' ( t )

In this equation, k is curvature, r is the parameterization of the curve, and T is the unit tangent vector to r. The tangent plane can be found by finding the normal vector at the point in question and then finding a plane that the normal vector goes through. Once you have curvature, you can find the mean curvature of the entire surface, by calculating the integral of all curvatures and dividing by 2pi. If the mean curvature is zero, we have a minimal surface.

A more exciting way to figure out if a surface is a minimal surface is with bubbles. They are a simple, real-world way to check for minimal surfaces, as they will fill the area with as little bubble solution as possible.

For example, I created a shape similar to that of a basic bubble wand (circle), but I distorted it in the z direction by cos(5x) to give it a zigzag look as seen below:
I believe that even though the edge of the circle goes up and down, the bubble will form and will pull towards the center in order to minimize the amount of bubble juice used. I chose this shape because even though the edges are unique, the minimal surface should be fairly basic, or minimal.

I also wanted to experiment with a helicoid because I think the minimal surface on it will form a sort of slide-like bubble that wraps around the edges when dipped in the bubble juice. The picture below shows my second example of a helicoid:
I made and tested versions of both of these shapes with pipe cleaners and I am interested to see if the harder surface forms the same minimal surfaces as the pipe cleaners. You'll notice both of my shapes also have an extend line attached to them and I have added this to make the bubble process slightly less messy, but it should not affect the minimal surface effect.

I believe these objects should both print fairly easy with minimal supports and complications, but as always, we will see.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...