Skip to main content

Minimal Surfaces

Introduction

Imagine you work for a company that manufactures cake stands like the one pictured below.

You are in charge of packaging and decide to wrap the stand with shrink wrap. However, to save money you want the amount of shrink wrap between the top plate and bottom stand to be as small as possible.

This is an example of a minimal surface: the surface between two frames with the minimum possible area. This post will explore a mathematical definition of these surfaces and examine some more interesting examples.

A Mathematical Definition of Minimal Surfaces

Even though we know minimal surfaces are the surface of minimal area between a given frame, what does this mean mathematically? Although there are several ways to define a minimal surface, we will use a definition involving curvature.

Curvature is a concept you may have learned in a calculus course. In two dimensions, it is a value that measures how curvy a line is at a given point. The calculation is: \[ K = \frac{\| \vec{T}(t) \|}{\| \vec{r}(t) \|}\ \] in which \( \vec{r}(t) \) is the parametrization of the curve and \( \vec{T}(t) \) is the unit tangent to \( \vec{r}(t) \).

Notably, this equation works for a two-dimensional line- how would we apply it to 3 dimensions? For our 3-dimensional surface, what we aim to do is find the average curvature of a point on our surface. To do this, we imagine that we slice our surface through that point. The cross section will be a line for which we can calculate the curvature at our point. If we do this infinite times and take the average, we will get the average curvature of that point. As we do this, we want to make sure we only make slices that result in non-trivial cuts. For example, if we were to take the slice through the point that is perpendicular to the surface, our cross-section would only be a point, for which we cannot take the curvature. Thus, to avoid any of these weird cases, we start our calculations by finding any plane that is perpendicular to our surface at the point and rotating this to find all the feasible cuts through that point. Thus, if we define \( \theta \) as the angle our starting normal plane is rotated, the mean curvature can be calculated as follows: \[ \frac{1}{2 \pi}\ \int_{0}^{2 \pi} K( \theta ) \, d\theta\ \]

Now, how does this relate to minimal surfaces? A surface is minimal when the mean curvature we calculate above is 0 for every point on the surface.

Minimal Surfaces as Bubbles

One easy way to visualize minimal surfaces is to use bubble solution. When a frame is dipped in the solution, it automatically forms the smallest surface between the frames. The bubble frame I decided to use were two stars above each other, but with the top one rotated so that the points were offset. The frame looks as depicted below:

I predict that the minimal surface will be stretched inward between the stars, and pulled outward to reach the points of the stars. In other words, I expect it to look similiar to the image below:

Why this example?

I chose this frame because between the interesting shapes of the top and bottom frames and the rotation of the top frame, the model had plenty of interesting characteristics that seemed like they would lend themselves well to forming an interesting minimal surface. I particularly liked that the frames jutted out in different directions, which I imagine would pull the minimal surface in interesting ways.

Author: Sarah Bombrys

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...