Skip to main content

Minimal Surfaces : Trefoil Knot

Minimal Surfaces : Trefoil Knot

A minimal surface is the surface with minimal area for a given perimeter. As such, what is the minimal surface of a perimeter is am easy question with a hard answer. More formally, a surface, \(S\), is minimal if and only if for every point of \(S\) has a neighborhood bounded by a simple closed curve which has the least area among all surfaces with the same boundary. Soap bubbles are often used when discussing minimal surfaces because the soap naturally creates a minimal surface given a perimeter—note, an actual soap bubble that is a sphere is not a minimal surface as it does not have a boundary perimeter. As simple minimal surface to begin thinking about is the catenoid, shown below.

The curved surface of the catenoid represents the minimal surface for our given perimeter—i.e. the two circles at the top and bottom. If you think back to the last time you played with bubbles, you might remember seeing either this shape or other similar ones. See the image below to see that soap bubbles will in fact form the catenoid as the minimal surface between two perimeter circles.

There are a number of ways to formally define what a minimal surface is, one of which we touched upon earlier. Now, however, I am going to give what I feel is a more useful, but perhaps less intuitive, definition for a minimal surface:

We will define curvature by \[ \kappa = \frac{ \| \vec{T} '(t) \| }{ \| \vec{r} '(t) \|} \] where \( \kappa\) is curvature, \(\vec{r} (t)\) is the parameterization of a curve, and \(\vec{T} (t)\) is the unit tangent vector to \(\vec{r} (t)\). For a surface \(M\) in \( ℝ^3 \), there is a tangent plane at each point. Every point on \(M\) has a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Intersect any plane containing the normal vector with the surface in order to get a curve, defined by \(f(x)\). Note that the average of the curve defined by \(f(x)\) over \([a,b]\) is \[ \frac{1}{b-a} \int^{b}_{a} f(x) dx. \] As we rotate the plane always containing the normal vector by the angle \(\theta\) the curvature varies so we must compute the mean curvature of the surface \(M\) at point \(p\) as follows \[ \frac{1}{2\pi} \int^{2\pi}_{0} \kappa(\theta) d\theta. \] The surface is a minimal surface if and only if the mean curvature at of every point \(p\) on the surface \(M\) is zero (0).

Following the general theme of this course we will be creating a 3D example; but how does one model a minimal surface in three dimensions? As previously stated, minimal surfaces are easy questions with hard answers, and also previously stated, soap bubbles will naturally create a minimal surface given a perimeter. So, we will be creating a perimeter, which will be called a frame when referring to the actual 3D model, that we can dip into soap bubble solution and then watch the soap bubbles form the minimal surfaces. This allows us to ask the easy question of what will our minimal surface be and get the tool of the bubble solution to do the hard work of answering the question for us.

As you will be able to tell from the title of this post, I will be attempting to determine what the minimal surface of a trefoil knot is via our frame and bubbles. An image of the frame I will be 3D printing can be found below, note this frame will be approximately 2 inches square when printed.

I was originally concerned that using a trefoil knot would be seen as repetitive, especially considering our next topic is also knots, but I decided that the surface the trefoil knot and its frame would produce were too interesting to pass up. The minimal surface formed will not be too revolutionary in all but one aspect. The simple aspect of the surface is that it will be a fairly average smooth surface with the exception being that it will intersect itself. Since a knot "passes through" itself so will the minimal surface. I find the terribly interesting as some of the points \(p\) on our surface \(M\) will have two normal vectors at the points of intersection, and those normal vectors will have two tangents vectors that are equal, and are the same vector in actuality. All while the mean curvature at these points \(p\) is zero.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Approximation of a Solid of Revolution

Most math teachers I've had have been able to break down Calculus into two very broad categories: derivatives and integrals. What is truly amazing, is how much you can do with these two tools. By using integration, it is possible to approximate the shape of a 2-D function that is rotated around an axis. This solid created from the rotation is known as a solid of revolution. To explain this concept, we will take a look at the region bounded by the two functions: \[ f(x) = 2^{.25x} - 1 \] and \[ g(x) = e^{.25x} - 1 \] bounded at the line y = 1. This region is meant to represent a cross section of a small bowl. While it may not perfectly represent this practical object, the approximation will be quite textured, and will provide insight into how the process works. The region bounded by the two functions can be rotated around the y-axis to create a fully solid object. This is easy enough to talk about, but what exactly does this new solid look like? Is...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...

Middle of Mass Measured from Moment

The center of mass of an object is the point that lies in the average position of mass in that object. For a normal polygon, that point is in the middle of the shape. However, if the shape is irregular, has concave angles, or has holes, the center of mass can be far from the middle of the object. Two things come into factor when determining the center of mass of an object. Weight and distance. Obviously, if one side of an object has more mass than the other, the center of mass will be on the heavier side. But, distance plays a role, too. If two sides of an object have the same mass, but one is farther from the middle, the center of mass will be on the side that has farther mass. Multiplying both of these factors together gives the moment of an object. Dividing the moment by the overall mass gives the location of the center of mass.   The reason I chose my shape is to mimic how those toy balancing birds work. The toy is a model bird with its wings outstretched. The ...