Skip to main content

Mathematical Illusions: Ambiguous Objects

A math major is an excellent pursuit for any individuals time in college. Learning about the nearly uncountable concepts and ideas that are available to learn and master is staggering. This alone makes it a worthwhile investment. An added bonus of becoming a math major: becoming a magician. From card tricks to optical illusions, becoming a math major/magician can leave your friends and family speechless.

Ambiguous Objects

For this adventure, we will be looking at the optical illusion created by ambiguous objects. An ambiguous object is an object that looks dramatically different in shape, based on the angle at which the object is viewed. From one side of an object, a person may see a star, and from the other side, a circle. The following image shows just that:
Credit to Dr. Kokichi Sugihara to the creation of both the object and the image. This contrast in shape seems impossible to create from just a change in perspective; it almost seems like magic (or photoshop). This magic depicted is the math behind ambiguous objects in action.

The Math Behind the Magic

The first concept that is relevant to the trick is perspective. As cool as it would be, an object cannot morph into two completely different shapes. The object is one shape that roughly looks like some amalgam of the two shapes. This combination of the two shapes is created by placing two curves flat on a plane, and then angling them in such a way that takes advantage of perspective. For simplicity, it is assumed that the two angles that the object is being viewed is 45 degrees on one side, and 45 on the other. It is also assumed that the onlooker is far enough away that the view of all points of the object is 45 degrees. The goal is to have one viewer see one curve while the other viewer sees the other curve. For this example consider the following two curves:
The curves currently lie flat on the xy-plane, but a parameterization can be written such that one viewer sees a point on the curve denoted as (x, f(x), 0) and the other viewer, at the same point, sees (t, f(t),0). The line that is parallel to the 45 degree angle vector (0,1,1) and goes through the first curve can be written as \[h(s,t) = (t, s + f(t), s)\]. The other curve that is at the other 45 degree angle can be written as \[k(s,t) = (t, -s+g(t),s) \] where f(t) and g(t) are the curves flat on the plane. This definition leads to the parameterization of the ambiguous object: \[ c(t) = (t, .5(f(t) + g(t)), .5(g(t) - f(t))) \] This curve gives the necessary curve to create the object that looks like two different shapes and concludes the magical explanation.

Explaining the Example

To keep with the trend of magic, the example consist of a curve of a diamond and the curve of a spade. These two curves are different enough to show the illusion in action, and it came out quite nicely. The following two images show the opposite perspectives of the object in OpenSCAD:

The Curves

These curves were both created in a piecewise fashion. There are 2 parts to each curve for a total of four parts. The diamond is formed by the curves: \[ f_1(x) = \sin(x)^4 and f_2(x) = -\sin(x)^4\] Mapped over domains [0,180] and (180,360] respectively. The top part of the spade was formed by the curve: \[g_1(x) = .5|\sin(x)|^.5 \] With domain [0,180] and the bottom was formed over the remaining domain by the curve: \[g_2(x) = -\sin(x) \]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...
Post a Comment
Read more