Skip to main content

Mathematical Illusions: Ambiguous Objects

A math major is an excellent pursuit for any individuals time in college. Learning about the nearly uncountable concepts and ideas that are available to learn and master is staggering. This alone makes it a worthwhile investment. An added bonus of becoming a math major: becoming a magician. From card tricks to optical illusions, becoming a math major/magician can leave your friends and family speechless.

Ambiguous Objects

For this adventure, we will be looking at the optical illusion created by ambiguous objects. An ambiguous object is an object that looks dramatically different in shape, based on the angle at which the object is viewed. From one side of an object, a person may see a star, and from the other side, a circle. The following image shows just that:
Credit to Dr. Kokichi Sugihara to the creation of both the object and the image. This contrast in shape seems impossible to create from just a change in perspective; it almost seems like magic (or photoshop). This magic depicted is the math behind ambiguous objects in action.

The Math Behind the Magic

The first concept that is relevant to the trick is perspective. As cool as it would be, an object cannot morph into two completely different shapes. The object is one shape that roughly looks like some amalgam of the two shapes. This combination of the two shapes is created by placing two curves flat on a plane, and then angling them in such a way that takes advantage of perspective. For simplicity, it is assumed that the two angles that the object is being viewed is 45 degrees on one side, and 45 on the other. It is also assumed that the onlooker is far enough away that the view of all points of the object is 45 degrees. The goal is to have one viewer see one curve while the other viewer sees the other curve. For this example consider the following two curves:
The curves currently lie flat on the xy-plane, but a parameterization can be written such that one viewer sees a point on the curve denoted as (x, f(x), 0) and the other viewer, at the same point, sees (t, f(t),0). The line that is parallel to the 45 degree angle vector (0,1,1) and goes through the first curve can be written as \[h(s,t) = (t, s + f(t), s)\]. The other curve that is at the other 45 degree angle can be written as \[k(s,t) = (t, -s+g(t),s) \] where f(t) and g(t) are the curves flat on the plane. This definition leads to the parameterization of the ambiguous object: \[ c(t) = (t, .5(f(t) + g(t)), .5(g(t) - f(t))) \] This curve gives the necessary curve to create the object that looks like two different shapes and concludes the magical explanation.

Explaining the Example

To keep with the trend of magic, the example consist of a curve of a diamond and the curve of a spade. These two curves are different enough to show the illusion in action, and it came out quite nicely. The following two images show the opposite perspectives of the object in OpenSCAD:

The Curves

These curves were both created in a piecewise fashion. There are 2 parts to each curve for a total of four parts. The diamond is formed by the curves: \[ f_1(x) = \sin(x)^4 and f_2(x) = -\sin(x)^4\] Mapped over domains [0,180] and (180,360] respectively. The top part of the spade was formed by the curve: \[g_1(x) = .5|\sin(x)|^.5 \] With domain [0,180] and the bottom was formed over the remaining domain by the curve: \[g_2(x) = -\sin(x) \]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Approximation of a Solid of Revolution

Most math teachers I've had have been able to break down Calculus into two very broad categories: derivatives and integrals. What is truly amazing, is how much you can do with these two tools. By using integration, it is possible to approximate the shape of a 2-D function that is rotated around an axis. This solid created from the rotation is known as a solid of revolution. To explain this concept, we will take a look at the region bounded by the two functions: \[ f(x) = 2^{.25x} - 1 \] and \[ g(x) = e^{.25x} - 1 \] bounded at the line y = 1. This region is meant to represent a cross section of a small bowl. While it may not perfectly represent this practical object, the approximation will be quite textured, and will provide insight into how the process works. The region bounded by the two functions can be rotated around the y-axis to create a fully solid object. This is easy enough to talk about, but what exactly does this new solid look like? Is...
8 comments
Read more

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more