Skip to main content

Ambiguous Objects

Introduction
Ambiguous objects are very unique images or objects that create ambiguity. Ambiguity is a vague meaning of a phrase, statement, image, etc., is not explicitly defined. Ambiguous objects can be either two-dimensional or three-dimensional. For our topic today, we will be understanding how ambiguous objects work through understanding exploitation of graphical similarities between two functions of a curve. Ambiguous objects may be more commonly known as optical illusions. Some of the more commonly known optical illusions are the Rubin vase, the rabbit-duck illusion, and the Kanizsa Triangle.
The image above is an example of the Kanizsa Triangle optical illusion. The spatially separated fragments give the impression of a triangle! These are just some examples of optical illusions that have been created. However, those optical illusions are two-dimensional. Now that we have a brief introduction with some common forms of ambiguous objects, we can further understand just how much we can stretch the ambiguity.
Ambiguous Objects?
As stated before, ambiguous objects can be three-dimensional as well. Today, we will be looking at two curves that will "share" the space of the curve and create a rather interesting shape. Then, depending on how the single object is viewed, the two different curves will be viewed. To understand this better, imagine that you are standing on one side of the object and someone else is standing on the other side of the object. From your perspective, you may see a circle or a triangle to be blunt, while the other person may be seeing a pentagon or another shape. This is the main idea that we are going to be looking at today!
Ambiguous Object Example
If we want to create an ambiguous object, we first need to start with picking out two shapes that we want our individuals to see. For my example, I have chosen the first shape to be a heart and the second shape to be kind of like a rhombus. From the image, we now have the shapes that our individuals will see, but we need to create the respective curves in the same plane by first parameterizing our shapes. For the heart, it is parameterized by the following equations: \[x(t)=cos(x)^3\] \[y(t)=0.5sin(x)-cos(x)^2\]
For the rhombus it is parameterized by the following equations: \[x(t)=cos(x)^3\] \[y(t)=2sin(x)+cos(x)^3\].
Now that we have our parameterizations, we want our individuals to be on opposite ends of the shapes, so they can see either shape. The individuals will be looking at the object from a 45-degree angle. From this angle, there is a certain point of intersection on where the two individuals are viewing the object from. To find this intersection, we have to represent respective vectors for both the individuals. The individual viewing the heart has a vector of (0,1,1) and the individual viewing the rhombus has a vector of (0,-1,1). Now, when we find the equation through the parametrization from before with the respective vector, we get a new parameterization that we can then set equal to each other. For the heart, we get a paramertization of \([cos(x)^3,0.5sin(x)-cos(x)^2+s,s]\) and for the rhombus \([cos(x)^3,2sin(x)+cos(x)^3-t,t]\). Now, we can set the two equal to each other to find the intersection. By doing this, we can find where the points intersect. This will give us a new curve with the parametrization of \[[cos(x),\frac{1}{2}(cos(x)^3+cos(x)^2+1.5sin(x),-\frac{1}{2}(cos(x)^3+cos(x)^2+1.5sin(x)]\] Lastly, we will generate our final image and add a visual aid of where to view the object from as if you were one of the individuals from before.
Why This Example?
I chose this example for multiple reasons. First, I really liked how the object stretched the ambiguity and produced a rather interesting curve. I believe that the parameterization tied with the two shapes was rather easy to solve, thus making the example easy and understanding to someone just learning the topic. I really liked this object as it allowed me to further understand ambiguous objects myself.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...