Skip to main content

Ambiguous Objects

Ambiguous objects are objects that create an optical illusion to the human eye by exploiting the similarities between two objects. Ambiguity can occur between two dimensional images or shapes but can also appear in three dimensional objects. For example, you've probably seen sometime of ambiguous, optical illusion as an image in a psychology class at some point. The image below (from an article on https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-31129-7) shows you an old woman, as well as a young woman depending on how you view the image.
Do you see it? You are only able to see one image at a time because the artist draws one feature that doubles as a different feature in the other image. For example, in the above image, the jaw line of the young woman doubles as the chin of the old lady. Do you see it now? It's a pretty good trick for your mind.

Ambiguous objects in three dimensions can be even harder to spot sometimes, but they are constructed the same way. They use shared features of two separate parts and create a single object where you can see both individual parts depending on how you view it. We are using a 3D printer to print these objects so we actually have them to view and don't have to imagine using 2D images.

I have decided to combine the parameterized curve of \([cos(x), cos^3(x), 0]\)
with the parameterized curve of \([cos(x), sin(x), 0]\).
Once we build our ambiguous object, an oberver from either end of our object standing at a 45 degree angle above our object, looking down, should be able to see each of the two images pictured above. Since our observers will be viewing from this angle, we must determine where the two lines of vision intersect. To do this we must first find the lines by finding the equation through \([cos(x), cos^3(x), 0]\) and parallel to \((0, 1, 1)\) and the equation through \([cos(x), sin(x), 0]\) and parallel to \((0, -1, -1)\). Our resulting parameterizations are \([cos(x), cos^3(x)+s, s]\) and \([cos(x), sin(x)-t, t]\). Now, in order to determine what these two curves have in common, we must set these new parameterizations equal to each other and solve for their point of intersection. After setting \([cos(x), cos^3(x)+s, s] = [cos(x), sin(x)-t, t]\) , we find that \(s = t = 1/2(sin(x)-cos^3(x))\) which, after plugging s and t back in to our parameterization, we find that a new curve is formed using commonalities between the two curves we started with and that is as follows: \[[cos(x), 1/2(sin(x)+cos^3(x)), 1/2(sin(x)-cos^3(x))]\]
Now, all thats left to do is finish building our object and we can do that by extending down our new curve to form a cylinder-like shape shown below.
A rectanglar plate has been added so we know to look from both of the longer sides of the rectangle. Viewed from one side and our red dot we see our first curve of \([cos(x), cos^3(x), 0]\).
Viewed from the other side and our green dot we see our second curve of \([cos(x), sin(x), 0]\).
I chose this particular shape because once the ambiguous object was built, it was very easy to differentiate between the two curves I started with and even someone who has never seen an ambiguous object before would be able to see the different curves. My print should be able to print without supports and hopefully I won't have too many issues.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...