Skip to main content

Ambiguous Objects

Ambiguous objects are objects that create an optical illusion to the human eye by exploiting the similarities between two objects. Ambiguity can occur between two dimensional images or shapes but can also appear in three dimensional objects. For example, you've probably seen sometime of ambiguous, optical illusion as an image in a psychology class at some point. The image below (from an article on https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-31129-7) shows you an old woman, as well as a young woman depending on how you view the image.
Do you see it? You are only able to see one image at a time because the artist draws one feature that doubles as a different feature in the other image. For example, in the above image, the jaw line of the young woman doubles as the chin of the old lady. Do you see it now? It's a pretty good trick for your mind.

Ambiguous objects in three dimensions can be even harder to spot sometimes, but they are constructed the same way. They use shared features of two separate parts and create a single object where you can see both individual parts depending on how you view it. We are using a 3D printer to print these objects so we actually have them to view and don't have to imagine using 2D images.

I have decided to combine the parameterized curve of \([cos(x), cos^3(x), 0]\)
with the parameterized curve of \([cos(x), sin(x), 0]\).
Once we build our ambiguous object, an oberver from either end of our object standing at a 45 degree angle above our object, looking down, should be able to see each of the two images pictured above. Since our observers will be viewing from this angle, we must determine where the two lines of vision intersect. To do this we must first find the lines by finding the equation through \([cos(x), cos^3(x), 0]\) and parallel to \((0, 1, 1)\) and the equation through \([cos(x), sin(x), 0]\) and parallel to \((0, -1, -1)\). Our resulting parameterizations are \([cos(x), cos^3(x)+s, s]\) and \([cos(x), sin(x)-t, t]\). Now, in order to determine what these two curves have in common, we must set these new parameterizations equal to each other and solve for their point of intersection. After setting \([cos(x), cos^3(x)+s, s] = [cos(x), sin(x)-t, t]\) , we find that \(s = t = 1/2(sin(x)-cos^3(x))\) which, after plugging s and t back in to our parameterization, we find that a new curve is formed using commonalities between the two curves we started with and that is as follows: \[[cos(x), 1/2(sin(x)+cos^3(x)), 1/2(sin(x)-cos^3(x))]\]
Now, all thats left to do is finish building our object and we can do that by extending down our new curve to form a cylinder-like shape shown below.
A rectanglar plate has been added so we know to look from both of the longer sides of the rectangle. Viewed from one side and our red dot we see our first curve of \([cos(x), cos^3(x), 0]\).
Viewed from the other side and our green dot we see our second curve of \([cos(x), sin(x), 0]\).
I chose this particular shape because once the ambiguous object was built, it was very easy to differentiate between the two curves I started with and even someone who has never seen an ambiguous object before would be able to see the different curves. My print should be able to print without supports and hopefully I won't have too many issues.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...
Post a Comment
Read more