Skip to main content

Structural Integrity of a Pringle

 Quadric surfaces are graphs of functions that can be put into the general form 

There are six examples of standard quadric surfaces: an ellipsoid, a cone, a cylinder, a hyperbola of 1 sheet, a hyperbola of 2 sheets, an elliptic paraboloid, and a hyperbolic paraboloid. Each surface contains different cross sections in the horizontal and vertical direction to build a model in the z direction.

One example I would like to focus on is hyperbolic paraboloids because I haven’t gotten to focus on an object with this type of curve or “saddle-like” appearance yet.  

The standard function for a hyperbolic paraboloid is

This surface is created where its vertical cross sections are parabolas, and its horizontal cross sections are hyperbolas. Which explains how the function gets its name. Because of these two opposing curves that are constantly using pushing and pulling forces, it provides a structural strength despite its thin layer. This design is often used in architecture as a roof design or in engineering as a support.

An Example

A fun example of this type of surface is a Pringle potato chip. I chose this function because Pringles are one of my favorite chips and I did not know there was so much reasoning to their fun and visually appealing shape. Pringles are purposely modeled from a hyperbolic paraboloid and after doing some research discovered the advantages of having chips this shape. According to Kathleen Villaluz from Interesting Engineering, Pringles have a hyperbolic paraboloid shape because it allows for easier stacking of the chips in their packaging. This then decreases the likelihood of chips breaking during transporting and handling by the stores. The shape also allows for the chip to have a strong structure preventing a line of stress forming because the intersection curves in the horizontal and vertical directions creates a balance of push and pull forces. This allows Pringles to have an extra crunch compared to other chips and that they will never break symmetrically. Instead, they will break in different directions because there is no symmetric line of stress to break on.


To demonstrate this example, we will focus on the following function to represent the Pringle.

Next, to show where a possible break in a Pringle might occur when taking a bite out of it, we will look at a plane and how it intersects the function.

First, we must find the equation of the plane then substitute it into the function equation for the intersection.

The standard equation of plane is Ax + By + Cz + D = 0. So for the plane perpendicular to (1, -1, 0), replace 1 for A, -1 for B, 0 for C, and 0 for D.

This shows to look at the plane x = y.  

Now we substitute x = y into the function to find the intersection.

Finally, the intersection is  



Now, the next time you have a Pringle, you will know why they are the superior chip (in my opinion) for their taste and mathematical shape! 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...
Post a Comment
Read more