Skip to main content

Slicing Quadric Surfaces

Introduction

After you’ve worked in two dimensions for a while, you’ve probably realized that a lot of the functions you graph can be organized into broad categories. For example, \( x^2-1 \) and \( -4x^2+3 \) are both recognizable as parabolas, even though they don't have the exact same shape. Other shapes you may have learned to recognize in two-dimensional space are circles, ellipsoids, and hyperbolas. Can we identify these same categories in three-dimensional space? The answer is yes, and they are called quadric surfaces.

Quadric Surfaces

When we limit the variables in our functions to having a maximum degree of two in three-dimensional space, the resulting shapes are called quadric surfaces. There are many types of quadric surfaces, including cones, ellipsoids, spheres, hyperboloids of one sheet, and more. For an example, we will examine the hyperbolic paraboloid, which has the following general form: \[ \frac{x^2}{a^2}\ - \frac{y^2}{b^2}\ =z \] Note that the locations of each variable can be switched and will still form a hyperbolic paraboloid, simply rotated about the different axes. Below several functions and graphs of hyperbolic paraboloids are provided:

Slicing Quadric Surfaces

One notable property of Quadric surfaces is that if you cut them in two, their cross section will be a function in two-dimensional space. Let’s see how this works with the first hyperbolic paraboloid in the previous image (\(z = \frac{x^2}{16}\ - \frac{y^2}{9}\ \)). In the process you’ll develop a better idea of what this surface looks like.

In order to cut our hyperbolic paraboloid in two and find its cross section, we will imagine that we are finding the surface’s intersection with a plane. Let’s say our plane can be expressed by the following equation: \[ 0 = -3x + y + 0z \]

Intersecting these two looks like the following, where the blue region is the plane, and the rainbow region is the hyperbolic paraboloid

Now, let’s determine their intersection. By rearranging the equation for our plane, we know that: \[ y=-3x \]

We can substitute this into the function for our quadric surface:

\[ \frac{x^2}{16}\ - \frac{(-3x)^2}{9}\ = z \] \[ \frac{x^2}{16}\ - x^2 = z \] \[ \frac{-15x^2}{16}\ = z \]

Therefore, the intersection of these two is a parabola in the \( xz \) plane. We can see this on the below model, in which the hyperbolic palabra has been cut open along the plane so that we can view the cross section:

Keep in mind this is only one potential plane we could use to slice our quadric surface. What if we used a different one? Take a look at the example below:

In this case, we can see just by looking at the image that the intersection ends up being a hyperbola. Given that slicing this surface gives us a parabola in some places and a hyperbola in others, doesn’t ‘hyperbolic paraboloid’ seem like a fitting name? Try looking at the cross sections of some of the other quadric surfaces, and you should find a similar reasoning behind their names as well.

Why this example?

This example was chosen first of all because the hyperbolic paraboloid is an interesting shape that can be sliced to create both hyperbolas (which is briefly mentioned in this blog post) and parabolas (which is shown mathematically). It was particularly convenient to focus on the parabolic slices because this results in a model with two pieces that stand easily next to each other to display the cut.

Author: Sarah Bombrys

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...