Skip to main content

Slicing Quadric Surfaces

Introduction

After you’ve worked in two dimensions for a while, you’ve probably realized that a lot of the functions you graph can be organized into broad categories. For example, \( x^2-1 \) and \( -4x^2+3 \) are both recognizable as parabolas, even though they don't have the exact same shape. Other shapes you may have learned to recognize in two-dimensional space are circles, ellipsoids, and hyperbolas. Can we identify these same categories in three-dimensional space? The answer is yes, and they are called quadric surfaces.

Quadric Surfaces

When we limit the variables in our functions to having a maximum degree of two in three-dimensional space, the resulting shapes are called quadric surfaces. There are many types of quadric surfaces, including cones, ellipsoids, spheres, hyperboloids of one sheet, and more. For an example, we will examine the hyperbolic paraboloid, which has the following general form: \[ \frac{x^2}{a^2}\ - \frac{y^2}{b^2}\ =z \] Note that the locations of each variable can be switched and will still form a hyperbolic paraboloid, simply rotated about the different axes. Below several functions and graphs of hyperbolic paraboloids are provided:

Slicing Quadric Surfaces

One notable property of Quadric surfaces is that if you cut them in two, their cross section will be a function in two-dimensional space. Let’s see how this works with the first hyperbolic paraboloid in the previous image (\(z = \frac{x^2}{16}\ - \frac{y^2}{9}\ \)). In the process you’ll develop a better idea of what this surface looks like.

In order to cut our hyperbolic paraboloid in two and find its cross section, we will imagine that we are finding the surface’s intersection with a plane. Let’s say our plane can be expressed by the following equation: \[ 0 = -3x + y + 0z \]

Intersecting these two looks like the following, where the blue region is the plane, and the rainbow region is the hyperbolic paraboloid

Now, let’s determine their intersection. By rearranging the equation for our plane, we know that: \[ y=-3x \]

We can substitute this into the function for our quadric surface:

\[ \frac{x^2}{16}\ - \frac{(-3x)^2}{9}\ = z \] \[ \frac{x^2}{16}\ - x^2 = z \] \[ \frac{-15x^2}{16}\ = z \]

Therefore, the intersection of these two is a parabola in the \( xz \) plane. We can see this on the below model, in which the hyperbolic palabra has been cut open along the plane so that we can view the cross section:

Keep in mind this is only one potential plane we could use to slice our quadric surface. What if we used a different one? Take a look at the example below:

In this case, we can see just by looking at the image that the intersection ends up being a hyperbola. Given that slicing this surface gives us a parabola in some places and a hyperbola in others, doesn’t ‘hyperbolic paraboloid’ seem like a fitting name? Try looking at the cross sections of some of the other quadric surfaces, and you should find a similar reasoning behind their names as well.

Why this example?

This example was chosen first of all because the hyperbolic paraboloid is an interesting shape that can be sliced to create both hyperbolas (which is briefly mentioned in this blog post) and parabolas (which is shown mathematically). It was particularly convenient to focus on the parabolic slices because this results in a model with two pieces that stand easily next to each other to display the cut.

Author: Sarah Bombrys

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...