Skip to main content

Ruling of a Plastic Heart


In mathematics, a surface is ruled if at every point on the surface, there is a distinct straight line on the surface. To better illustrate this concept, I give a picture of a ruled surface provided by user Ag2gaeh from the Wikipedia page regarding this topic. 
Point P lies on the surface, which has been constructed using only straight lines between the two arbitrary black curves. It is also possible to have a surface which has two distinct lines that lie on it at every point. These surfaces are doubly ruled. A famous example of a doubly ruled surface is the hyperboloid of one sheet. Below is an image of the hyperboloid of one sheet defined by two sets of distinct lines, rendered in OpenScad using code written by Dr. Kate Ponto.
Since a hyperboloid of one sheet can be constructed using only straight lines, this allows for their application in architecture and engineering since the doubly ruled structure provides exceptional support. Many people are able to recognize this structural motif in the cooling towers of nuclear reactors. In an article written by Duke Energy's Nuclear Information Center regarding cooling towers for nuclear reactors, they supply an image of a hyperbolic cooling tower under construction. The two sets of lines can be seen at the bottom of the image. 

In a final aside regarding ruled surfaces, is that the only surface in which three distinct lines sit on every point is the plane!

To create my own ruled surface, I chose the shape of a heart. Since OpenScad allows for the definition of an arbitrary function, I was able to write a parametric equation which defined the heart shape. Below I give the equation for the heart, along with how OpenScad renders it, defined on the interval 0-360 degrees with a step size of 3 degrees per iteration. 

\[r(t) = (x(t), y(t))  \\  x(t) = 16 \sin(t) ^3 \\ y(t)=13 \cos(t) - 5 \cos(2t) - 2 \cos(3t) - \cos(4t) \]

The equation above can be modified to accept a phase argument which will shift the order in which points appear to create the heart, but interestingly does not affect the orientation of the heart. The modified expression is below. 
\[x(t) = 16 \sin(t+phase) ^3 \\ y(t)=13 \cos(t+phase) - 5 \cos(2(t+phase)) - 2 \cos(3(t+phase)) - \cos(4(t+phase)) \]

The single ruled surface between these two curves is shown below. The above heart was affected by a phase shift of 55 degrees. 
Interestingly, I was able to wrap a second pair of lines between the surface, but I do not believe it qualifies as a doubly ruled surface, since it appeared there was a sharp intersection, rather than a gradual one. Even if it could qualify as a doubly ruled surface, it would probably be a similar case for the hyperboloid of one sheet qualifying as a doubly ruled surface, rather than a new discovery. Currently, I do not have the skill to prove or disprove this claim, and choose instead to show a rough rendering. To make the intersection more apparent, I shift the heart affected by the phase shift, up by 50 units from the bottom heart. 
As I stated above, a ruled surface can exist between any two arbitrary curves. In the above examples, the surface exists between two surfaces that only differ by a phase shift, but are identical in shape. To demonstrate the robustness of the singly ruled surface, I change the shape of the above heart by only shifting the phase of \(y(t)\). The modified equation is shown below.

\[x(t) = 16 \sin(t) ^3 \\ y(t)=13 \cos(t+phase) - 5 \cos(2(t+phase)) - 2 \cos(3(t+phase)) - \cos(4(t+phase)) \]
This causes the above heart to become slightly lopsided but the two hearts are still connectable by single lines!
For the print required for this project, I decided to print both the straight heart, and well as the lopsided heart. Both span 60mm (~2.5in) in the x-direction, and 50mm (~2.2in) in the y-direction, and have a height of 20mm (~0.8in). 












Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Finding an object's center of mass using integration

Thinking about center of mass As a kid, I would sit in class and balance my pencil on my finger. What I didn't know then was that I was finding the pencil's center of mass. An object's center of mass is a point where the average weight of the object lies. In other words, the weighted position vectors of the object at this point sum to zero (source: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/center-of-mass ). The exact location of this point can be found using calculus. First, it is important to understand the moment . The moment for a two-dimensional object is given with respect to both the x- and y-axes. It is a physical characteristic of the object a certain distance from these axes. It's easiest to think about the axes as reference points for where the characteristic acts; in this case, where the mass is distributed. When computing these moments, the hardest concept to grasp is that the moment with respect to y, for example, is given by the x-coordinat...

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...