Skip to main content

Ruled Surfaces

Introduction

A ruled surface is a surface between two curves connected by a straight line. The connected straight lines also have to lie on the surface. These lines would be made for all the points on the curves. To think about this, we can look at a tire laid flat on the ground. We know that there are two curves, a circle on top and a circle on the bottom. Using the definition, we know that the tire would be considered a ruled surface because we are able to make straight lines around both the curves connecting the two circles, where the lines always lie on the surface. In general, this example is just a cylinder but we can also have a ruled surface to form hyperboloids, cones and many more shapes.

Ruled Surface Example

Let's look at another simple example, a ladder. A ladder is made up of two straight lines, which are the curves. The steps on the ladders can be seen as connecting the two curves, which we know are straight that connect the outer two curves. This would also be considered a ruled surface. Now let's look at the same ladder example but let's say we twist one of the outer lines around the other line. You might think that the lines would not be straight but, in the image, below we can see it looks like a spiral staircase, also meaning that the lines are straight and lie on the surface. We can twist our curves as long as the lines we make are still straight. These are all examples that can seem boring, now we can look at something more interesting.



Our object is in the xyz-plane so I will be parametrizing each of the curves separately to give us a better idea of what is happening with the shape we get. For our first curve we get \begin{align*} x(s)&= \cos(s) + \cos^3(s) \\ y(s)&= \sin(s) + \sin^3(s) \\ z(s)&= 10 \end{align*}


These equation from above form the curve that can be seen on the right. For each value of s, we would plug it into the equations above. This would give us a point on the xyz-plane. This is our top curve.





Our bottom curve is given by the set of equations below. These equations make the curve on the right. We can differentiate which curve is on the top by the z(s) equations which are both constants. \begin{align*} x(s)&= \cos(s) + \cos^4(s) \\ y(s)&= \sin(s) + \sin^3(s) \\ z(s)&= 0 \end{align*}

These are our two curves now let's view them as a ruled surface. As we recall we should be able to make straight lines from the bottom curve to the top. In the image below on the left we can see that this would be considered a ruled surface as we can see the straight lines connecting the two curves. However, on the right we can see the same curves, but the top curve is shifted by 100 degrees. This may seem confusing, but if we look closely the lines connecting the curves are still straight, but now they are slanted. Both surfaces are considered as ruled surfaces. We can twist our curve further, but we would then get lines that intersect and it wouldn't look too appealing.
One additional thing that should be noted is that there is no limit on how many lines that can be used to connect the curves. In the next image you can see that there are much more lines used than the previous images to connect the curves.


Why This Example

The parametrization for both curves are very similar. Which makes it very interesting because our two curves look very different from each other. I also like this example because we are able to see the lines connecting the two curves are slanted but are still straight. When I was choosing my equations the final outcome of these reminded me of a vase, probably one you can find on Valentine's Day. Even after picking interesting curves it is always helpful being able to visualize the final product. The dimensions of this object should be 29.53mm × 38.58mm × 45.56mm when printed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...