Skip to main content

Quadric Surfaces

Quadric surfaces are defined as functions of the form: \[ Ax^2 + By^2 + Cz^2 + Dxy + Exz + Fyz + Gx + Hy + Iz + J = 0 \] There are many surfaces that can be created from this equation. There are many factors that can affect the shape of the created surface. The signs of the coefficients can result in completely different shapes and the magnitude of these coefficients stretch and shrink the surface. One example of these quadric surfaces is a hyperboloid of one sheet. This shape visually appears as a hyperbola that has been rotated around an axis. This equation can be represented in two main ways: implicitly as a function of x, y, and z, and as a parameterization. For this case, the parameterization will be used.

Paratmerizations of the Surface

The parameterization of this surface is a fun one: \[ f(s,t) = ( (e^{.2s} + e^{-.2s})\cos{30t}, .5(e^{.2s} + e^{-.2s})\sin{30t}, .5(e^{.2s} + e^{-.2s}) \] Euler's constant is a result of the use of the hyperbolic trig functions used to parameterize the original function. In terms of hyperbolic trig functions the parameterization can be represented as: \[ f(s,t) = (2\cosh(.2s)\cos(30t), \cosh(.2s)\sin(30t), \sinh(.2s)) \] At this point, we have a parameterization that gives the quadric surface:
This hyperboloid of one sheet is a single piece that opens up on the z-axis. The surface is twice as long along the x-axis as compared to the y-axis.

Taking a Slice

For any quadric surface, a plane, or some other line or curve, can be uesd to cut through the surface. The result is a slice of the 3d shape. This slice is interesting as it the shape of this slice can vary greatly throughout the same quadric surface. Let's cut this hyperboloid into two different pieces using a plane. The plane that will be used to slice is: \[ x = z \] This 45 degree plane will take out a nice hyperbola that contains componenets of the hyperboloid on both the negative and positive sides of every axis. This hyperbola will also have symmetry about the x-axis. Here is a picture of the hyperboloid with the slice shown:

The Resulting Slice

The slice mentioned above was created by setting x equal to z. This will most easily be done by formulating the implicit equation of the surface. From the parameterization, it can be seen that the radius in the x direction is 2, and the radius in the y direction is 1. It can also be determined that the coefficient for the z value is also 1, since there are no constants in the parameterization. This means that the formula in terms of x, y, and z is: \[ \frac{x^2}{4} + y^2 - z^2 =1 \] Setting z = x gives: \[ \frac{x^2}{4} + y^2 - x^2 = -3\frac{x^2}{4} + y^2 = 1 \] Which is the equation of a hyperbola. Hyperboloids are interesting as they can generate many different shapes depending on the hyperboloid itself and the position of the slice from the hyperboloid. Under the right conditions, the possible slices of an ellipse include circles, ellipses, parabolas, and hyperbolas. This box of chocolates makes this specific surfaces quite appealing for taking a slice. I wanted to take out a hyperbola from this surfaces as it is the most interesting. This slice takes the a piece from either side of the x-axis to generate a symmetrical section. This piece also has the property that when rotated around the z-axis in an elliptical path, it recreates the original surface. This is true for any hyperobla with symmetry about the x-axis.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...