Skip to main content

Quadratic Surfaces

Introduction

Quadratic surfaces are 3-dimensional and can be seen on the xyz-plane. One way to think about this is that quadratic surfaces are the same as looking at a conic section in 3-dimentions. The equation to a quadratic surface is the following where A-J are constants \[Ax^2+By^2+Cz^2+Dxy+Exz+Fyz+Gx+Hy+Iz+J=0\] You may have noticed that each term doesn't exceed the exponent of 2. This is how we are able to tell that this is a quadratic surface. This equation is hard to understand but by rotations and translations the equation is modified, and we can get 7 possible outcomes.

Quadratic Surfaces

The possible outcomes are the following an ellipsoid, cylinder, cone, elliptic paraboloid, hyperboloid of 1 sheet, hyperboloid of 2 sheet, and the hyperbolic paraboloid. For each of these shapes they have an associated formula derived from the quadratic surface formula mentioned above.

Ellipsoid: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}+\frac{z^2}{c^2} = 1\)

Cylinder: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}=r\)

Cone: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}-\frac{z^2}{c^2}=0\)

Elliptic Paraboloid: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}=z\)

Hyperboloid of 1 sheet: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}-\frac{z^2}{c^2}=1\)

Hyperboloid of 2 sheet: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}-\frac{z^2}{c^2}=-1\)

Hyperbolic Paraboloid: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}-\frac{y^2}{b^2}=z\)

From each of these formulae we can see that the exponent of each variable is a maximum of 2. To look at closely we will be using the hyperbolic paraboloid. In the image below we can see how a hyperbolic paraboloid can look where a = 2, b = 3.



Another thing to note is that the signs for each formula are interchangeable with each other. By doing this the shape does not change it only changes the orientation of how it lays on the xyz-plane.

Slicing A Quadratic Surface

We have looked at all the different shapes a quadratic surface can be. Now we will look at how an intersection to these surfaces would look like. Before we go into an example let's think about an ice-cream cone. We can get two shapes a circle and an ellipse depending on how we slice the cone. We can have different looking intersections on the same surface depending on how and where the plane goes through the surface. We will continue using the hyperbolic paraboloid.

In the image to the left our surface is split into two pieces by a plane. We know that the plane intersected our surface perpendicular to the vector (1,1,0). With this vector we are able to determine our plane \begin{align*} x*1 +y*1 +z*0 &=0 \\ x+y&=0 \\ y&=-x \end{align*}

We have the equation of our plane which we can now use to find the equation of the intersection. In order to do this, we simply plug in the equation of the plane we found into our original formula for our surface. \begin{align*} z &= \frac{x^2}{4}-\frac{y^2}{9} \\ &=\frac{x^2}{4}-\frac{(-x)^2}{9} \\ z&=\frac{x^2}{4}-\frac{x^2}{9} = \frac{5x^2}{36} \end{align*} This is our equation to the intersection that was formed by the plane above. In the picture below we can clearly see how our intersection looks like a parabola. Which further shows our equation is correct which also is a parabola.



Why this Example

I chose particularly this quadratic surface because I was able to visualize this shape as a pringle. Being able to visualize the surface helps how the intersections can look like on this surface. The visualization helped me understand the different possible shape outcomes from this single quadratic surface. Choosing this surface also made it easier on finding the equation of the intersection because of how the z variable appeared in the formula.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...