Skip to main content

Quadratic Surfaces

Introduction

Quadratic surfaces are 3-dimensional and can be seen on the xyz-plane. One way to think about this is that quadratic surfaces are the same as looking at a conic section in 3-dimentions. The equation to a quadratic surface is the following where A-J are constants \[Ax^2+By^2+Cz^2+Dxy+Exz+Fyz+Gx+Hy+Iz+J=0\] You may have noticed that each term doesn't exceed the exponent of 2. This is how we are able to tell that this is a quadratic surface. This equation is hard to understand but by rotations and translations the equation is modified, and we can get 7 possible outcomes.

Quadratic Surfaces

The possible outcomes are the following an ellipsoid, cylinder, cone, elliptic paraboloid, hyperboloid of 1 sheet, hyperboloid of 2 sheet, and the hyperbolic paraboloid. For each of these shapes they have an associated formula derived from the quadratic surface formula mentioned above.

Ellipsoid: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}+\frac{z^2}{c^2} = 1\)

Cylinder: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}=r\)

Cone: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}-\frac{z^2}{c^2}=0\)

Elliptic Paraboloid: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}=z\)

Hyperboloid of 1 sheet: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}-\frac{z^2}{c^2}=1\)

Hyperboloid of 2 sheet: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}-\frac{z^2}{c^2}=-1\)

Hyperbolic Paraboloid: \(\frac{x^2}{a^2}-\frac{y^2}{b^2}=z\)

From each of these formulae we can see that the exponent of each variable is a maximum of 2. To look at closely we will be using the hyperbolic paraboloid. In the image below we can see how a hyperbolic paraboloid can look where a = 2, b = 3.



Another thing to note is that the signs for each formula are interchangeable with each other. By doing this the shape does not change it only changes the orientation of how it lays on the xyz-plane.

Slicing A Quadratic Surface

We have looked at all the different shapes a quadratic surface can be. Now we will look at how an intersection to these surfaces would look like. Before we go into an example let's think about an ice-cream cone. We can get two shapes a circle and an ellipse depending on how we slice the cone. We can have different looking intersections on the same surface depending on how and where the plane goes through the surface. We will continue using the hyperbolic paraboloid.

In the image to the left our surface is split into two pieces by a plane. We know that the plane intersected our surface perpendicular to the vector (1,1,0). With this vector we are able to determine our plane \begin{align*} x*1 +y*1 +z*0 &=0 \\ x+y&=0 \\ y&=-x \end{align*}

We have the equation of our plane which we can now use to find the equation of the intersection. In order to do this, we simply plug in the equation of the plane we found into our original formula for our surface. \begin{align*} z &= \frac{x^2}{4}-\frac{y^2}{9} \\ &=\frac{x^2}{4}-\frac{(-x)^2}{9} \\ z&=\frac{x^2}{4}-\frac{x^2}{9} = \frac{5x^2}{36} \end{align*} This is our equation to the intersection that was formed by the plane above. In the picture below we can clearly see how our intersection looks like a parabola. Which further shows our equation is correct which also is a parabola.



Why this Example

I chose particularly this quadratic surface because I was able to visualize this shape as a pringle. Being able to visualize the surface helps how the intersections can look like on this surface. The visualization helped me understand the different possible shape outcomes from this single quadratic surface. Choosing this surface also made it easier on finding the equation of the intersection because of how the z variable appeared in the formula.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...