Skip to main content

Parametric Surfaces & Level Curves : Elevations of Horsetooth Rock

Parametric Surfaces & Level Curves : Elevations of Horsetooth Rock

Parametric surfaces are surfaces that exist in \( ℝ^3 \), or in 3D, which is defined by two parameters in \( ℝ^2 \). Thus we have a 3D surface that is given by a function of two parameters, usually \(x\) and \(y\), that gives us a \(z\)—typically thought of as the vertical direction, or the one that "comes towards you." This can be written in a somewhat familiar form(s) as:

\[ f(x,y)=z, \\ f(x,z)=y, \\ f(y,z)=x.\]

Now that we have established the basics of what a parametric equation is we can move on to a discussion of level curves. A level curve of a two variable function \(f\) is a curve of the form \( f(x,y)=k\), where \(k\) is a constant in the range of \(f\). So, what we are really doing is setting \(k\)—which is a coordinate of a point in relation to the \(z\)-axis—to a constant "height" such that we can draw a curve on our surface that essentially represents/demarcates where that height occurs on our surface.

You have probably seen level curves before on topographic maps(an example is pictured below). These maps show natural features and terrain, like most non-political maps do, but also show topographic lines. These lines show elevation, which is useful for determining the elevation of a location, or the slope and subsequent "steepness" of a location—whether it be a building site, hike route, etc..

The example topographic map above shows Horsetooth Mountain or Horsetooth Rock and includes topographic lines. Particularly, you can see that elevations of 6,566 feet and 7,255 feet are marked clearly with dark lines. What these lines represent are constant elevations, this is the same as setting \(k\) as a constant, they are level curves of a parametric equation. Furthermore, it is possible—though difficult—to create a parametric equation that actually maps the surface of surface of Horsetooth Rock and then we could calculate the level curves for those elevations.

Horsetooth Rock is an actual natural feature located in Larimer County, Colorado, and is contained within a state park and municipal open space. There is also a trail to the top that is approximately 5 miles long and has a change in elevation of about 1,500 feet. Over the summer I hiked this trail and as such Horsetooth Rock was my inspiration of starting point in developing a parametric equation and some level curves. Horsetooth Rock pictured below along with a link to Larimer County's website:

https://www.larimer.org/naturalresources/parks/horsetooth-mountain

As previously stated, constructing an equation that would exactly recreate the surface of this natural landmark would be quite difficult so, and approximation of the surface of the actual rock itself has been constructed. That equation is shown below: \[ f(x,y) = -0.02(x^4-4x^2)-2y^2+5\] Which maps a surface that is shown in the following image:

To plot our level curves we can solve this equation, using a constant \(k\) as our elevation, and solve our equation for \(y\)—changing it into slope-intercept form, that will allow us to plot some level curves—that equation is shown below: \[ y= \sqrt{ \frac{5-k-0.02(x^4-4x^2)}{2}} \] and will plot curves that resemble the following image when viewed from above.

We can combine our 3D graph of our approximation of Horsetooth Rock with our level curves plot to give a surface with level curves that looks like the following

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...
Post a Comment
Read more