Skip to main content

Parametric Surfaces & Level Curves : Elevations of Horsetooth Rock

Parametric Surfaces & Level Curves : Elevations of Horsetooth Rock

Parametric surfaces are surfaces that exist in \( ℝ^3 \), or in 3D, which is defined by two parameters in \( ℝ^2 \). Thus we have a 3D surface that is given by a function of two parameters, usually \(x\) and \(y\), that gives us a \(z\)—typically thought of as the vertical direction, or the one that "comes towards you." This can be written in a somewhat familiar form(s) as:

\[ f(x,y)=z, \\ f(x,z)=y, \\ f(y,z)=x.\]

Now that we have established the basics of what a parametric equation is we can move on to a discussion of level curves. A level curve of a two variable function \(f\) is a curve of the form \( f(x,y)=k\), where \(k\) is a constant in the range of \(f\). So, what we are really doing is setting \(k\)—which is a coordinate of a point in relation to the \(z\)-axis—to a constant "height" such that we can draw a curve on our surface that essentially represents/demarcates where that height occurs on our surface.

You have probably seen level curves before on topographic maps(an example is pictured below). These maps show natural features and terrain, like most non-political maps do, but also show topographic lines. These lines show elevation, which is useful for determining the elevation of a location, or the slope and subsequent "steepness" of a location—whether it be a building site, hike route, etc..

The example topographic map above shows Horsetooth Mountain or Horsetooth Rock and includes topographic lines. Particularly, you can see that elevations of 6,566 feet and 7,255 feet are marked clearly with dark lines. What these lines represent are constant elevations, this is the same as setting \(k\) as a constant, they are level curves of a parametric equation. Furthermore, it is possible—though difficult—to create a parametric equation that actually maps the surface of surface of Horsetooth Rock and then we could calculate the level curves for those elevations.

Horsetooth Rock is an actual natural feature located in Larimer County, Colorado, and is contained within a state park and municipal open space. There is also a trail to the top that is approximately 5 miles long and has a change in elevation of about 1,500 feet. Over the summer I hiked this trail and as such Horsetooth Rock was my inspiration of starting point in developing a parametric equation and some level curves. Horsetooth Rock pictured below along with a link to Larimer County's website:

https://www.larimer.org/naturalresources/parks/horsetooth-mountain

As previously stated, constructing an equation that would exactly recreate the surface of this natural landmark would be quite difficult so, and approximation of the surface of the actual rock itself has been constructed. That equation is shown below: \[ f(x,y) = -0.02(x^4-4x^2)-2y^2+5\] Which maps a surface that is shown in the following image:

To plot our level curves we can solve this equation, using a constant \(k\) as our elevation, and solve our equation for \(y\)—changing it into slope-intercept form, that will allow us to plot some level curves—that equation is shown below: \[ y= \sqrt{ \frac{5-k-0.02(x^4-4x^2)}{2}} \] and will plot curves that resemble the following image when viewed from above.

We can combine our 3D graph of our approximation of Horsetooth Rock with our level curves plot to give a surface with level curves that looks like the following

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...
Post a Comment
Read more