Skip to main content

Level Curves

Introduction

Level curves can help us visualize a 3-dimensional object on the 2-dimensional plane. The most common example that you might have seen before is a topographic map. In the image below without realizing you may be able to tell how this graph might look in 3-dimensions. We can see that there are multiple lines, and we can notice that they do not cross each other. Each line that you see represents a different elevation or height which is why the lines do not intersect. Another thing you might have noticed is that the closer together the lines are the steeper the slope would be. This is how we can represent a mountain on a piece of paper.



Example

Let's look at an example to see how this works. We will be looking at the function \[f(x,y)=\frac{0.1x^2+0.1y^2}{2}\] Then I have further bounded this by \begin{align*} -10≤x≤10 \\ -10≤y≤10 \end{align*}



Our function that I have chosen is paraboloid but then is cut off making a square bowl. This would give us a shape of a square bowl like the image on the right. We can see how the height and the shape of the bowl changes. The slope of the bowl is also getting steeper as we come near the edge of the bowl.



As you may have guessed we are going to use level curves to represent this bowl on the xy-plane. To find a level curve we will be using k-values that equals the function we are using: \[k=\frac{0.1x^2+0.1y^2}{2}\]

Here if we needed to we could have solved y or x if it could have made it easier to visualize how the curves would look like. However, if we keep it equal to k we can already see how the curves would look like because of the simple function we chose. For each k-value we give to our function would be a different level curve. For example, if k=1 we would find all the x and y values that make this function equal 1 and since the chosen function is a paraboloid, we know the level curve would look like an ellipse. Thanks to GeoGebra we can easily find the level curves of the function which can be seen below.



In the image above we see the level curves of our function. We are able to tell as we increase the k-value the level curves are getting closer to each other. By this we are able to tell the slope is increasing. These are the level curves to the function, but we also have x and y bounds which would change how our level curves would look. Below we can see how the bounds affect the level curves. The distance from one level curve to the next is still the same but the length of the curve we see is what changes.



The level curves in the image above are what they would look like for the square bowl we have. With the image below we can see how the bowl looks like with the level curves on it. We can see where the level curves that we calculated would appear on the bowl. There are 10 level curves that can be seen on the bowl which is minimized to 2X2 inches.



Why this example

By using this example, it makes it easier for new learners to understand this topic. By being able to relate the image to something that they have seen or can visualize can help them go through the thought process. I chose to use a simpler function because by doing this I did not have to solve for y or x because we already knew how the function would look like allowing more focus on the topic. We are still able to see how the curves would be closer together when the function gets steeper. Also by adding bounds I was able to show that the level curves can be broken even though they have the same height.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...