Skip to main content

Level Curves

Introduction

A lot of mathematics is spent in the two-dimensional plane, which is perfectly suited to a variety of applications. However, by graduating to working with functions in the three-dimensional realm, a mathematician gains the ability to handle many more real-world scenarios. To acclimate ourselves to thinking and working in 3D space, we are going to discuss the topic of level curves.

Level Curves

If I were to give you a function of two variables, for example \( z= \sqrt{4-x^2-y^2} \), would you be able to imagine what its graph looked like? If you haven’t had a lot of experience working in 3 dimensions, then probably not (by the way, it’s a sphere). But even for those more experienced with 3 dimensions, it can be difficult to envision the surface formed by less standard functions. For this reason, level curves are sometimes used to help us imagine what a surface would look like. A level curve for some value \( k \) is simply the line where a function takes on the value \( k \) , and can be found by setting \( f(x,y)=k \). Once we have found the level curves for a few values of \( k \), we can graph these equations in 2 dimensions to see how our surface is behaving. Let’s take a look at an example.

An Example

Imagine there is a wildlife preserve consisting of rolling hills that can be modeled by the following function: \[ f(x,y)=\sin(4xy) \] You have a good friend, Bob, a botanist, who frequently explores this preserve in search of endangered plant species. Bob knows that certain plants will only grow within certain altitude ranges, but poor Bob is directionally challenged and has difficulty keeping track of his location and altitude. Since you are an awesome friend, you decide to make Bob a map that will show him the changing altitudes so he can find these plant species more efficiently. We’ll calculate some level curves! For any value \( k \), we can calculate our level curve like below: \[ \sin(4xy)=k \] Let’s make this easier to graph: \[ y= \frac{\arcsin(k)}{4x} \] So, if we look at the values for which \( k=-0.8,-0.6,-0.4, -0.2, 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 \), we will get the following graph of the level curves.

Now, how can you explain to Bob how to use this map? (Note that the cooler colors represent a positive \( k \) value while the warmer colors represent the negative \( k \) values. Meanwhile, the function is 0 on the green line, which lines up with the \( x \) and \( y \) axes.). Looking at the locations of each level curve, we can see that our altitude is increasing in the first and third quadrants but decreasing in the second and fourth quadrants. Furthermore, the closeness of the lines indicates how steep the altitude of these regions is changing. For example, if Bob were to walk from \( (0,0) \) to \( (1,1) \), he would still be between the level curves for 0 and 0.2. However, if he again walked the same distance from \( (1,1) \) to \( (2,2) \), he would pass two level curves and be very close to our level curve for 0.6. This means we can imagine that the incline here is increasing, or, in other words, the hill is becoming steeper. Now take a look at the graph for our equation and compare it to our level curves.

The model below, on which the level curves we discussed above are highlight, demonstrate how you can think of a level curve as finding the cross section of our surface at height \( k \).

Why this example?

This example was chosen for several reasons, foremost among them its interesting shape. The surface contains a saddle point at its center, which allow the observer to see the function both increase and decrease on either side of this point. The presence of the sine function also contributes to making this function interesting by causing the slope to vary widely across the surface. This better illustrates the concepts of level curves because it allows an observer to observe how evenly spaced level curves are closer together when the function is steeper and farther apart when it is more gradual.

Author: Sarah Bombrys

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...