Skip to main content

Level Curves of a Water Drop!


A surface, or curve can have many equivalent representations. In some cases, a function of y in terms of x, can have a new representation in terms of a parameterizing variable t, where both x and y are expressed in terms of t.

 


Consider a circle of radius 1 in the 2D plane. The common representation is below, where y is expressed as two radical expressions. 

\[x^2 + y^2 = 1 \\ y = \pm  \sqrt{1-x^2}\]
 
However, the above expression is quite confusing, and y is expressed as two separate functions in order to create the whole image of the circle. Recalling trigonometry, each point on the unit circle corresponding to an angle, \(\theta\) has coordinates defined by the ordered pair, \(\displaystyle(\cos( \theta), \sin( \theta))\)

The x-coordinate on the unit circle for an angle \(\theta\) is defined by \(\cos( \theta)\) and likewise, the y-coordinate is defined by \(\sin( \theta) \)

This means we can redefine our above function of y in terms of x to create the unit circle in terms of a new parameter we can call t.

We simply let \(x = \cos(t) \) and \(y = \sin(t)\) and we can generate a new function \(r(t)\) where

\[r(t)=(x(t), y(t))\]

This new function gives us, given our chosen parameterization:

\[r(t) = (\cos(t), \sin(t))\]
Here, \(r(t)\) takes a single variable, and maps it onto the 2D plane to give us our original circle of radius 1! 

We can also parameterize an entire surface in 3-dimensions if we choose a parameterization of two variables.

I wanted to create a surface which had a similar undulating behavior to a drop of water, dropped into a larger pool. In this case, a wave oscillates out from a central point, but diminishes in amplitude as it propagates outward. To capture the the propagation in two directions, I needed two independent variables, which were mapped to a point in 3D space. 

Such a function has the following form:
\[r(u, v) = (u, v, z(u, v))\]

The function of u and v I chose was:

\[z(u,v) = \frac{\sin( \sqrt{u^2 + v^2 + c^2})}{\sqrt{u^2 + v^2 +c^2}}\]
Here, c is a constant, and I chose c=1 for simplicity
I also gave a scaling factor of  11 to make the wave pattern more dramatic
\[z(u,v) = 11*(\frac{\sin( \sqrt{u^2 + v^2 + 1})}{\sqrt{u^2 + v^2 +1}})\]

I give the plot of my surface below:
We can also see the behavior of a surface in a lower dimension by taking a "level curve" of the function. In the level curve, we find all points on the curve that are associated with a given value. In general a level curve of a function of two variables is:
\[f(x,y) = k\]
Here, we will get a plot, of all x, y such that they produce the value k given the function \(\displaystyle f(x,y)\)

To create the level curves for our function \(\displaystyle r(u, v)\), we can choose the values of independent variables which exactly equal the given value k. Below I give the level curves of \(\displaystyle r(u,v)=1\), which is equaivalent to finding u and v such that  \(\displaystyle z(u,v)=1\)

The level curves change as we change the value of k. Changing k from 1 to 0.1 gives a new plot!

Many values can simultaneously satisfy a given value of k. Also, we can see how choosing a value to define a level curve reduces our dimension of  \(r(u,v)\) from 3 to 2 dimensions. 

Due to the undulating nature of our "water droplet" curve, many values of u and v will simultaneously solve the level curve for a reasonable value of k. 

Any level curve can be thought about as inserting a plane in 3D space which slices the surface horizontally. For our above two examples, we had one plane at z = 1 and another at z=0.1 and just recorded which points on the surface that collided with the plane!  

Here is my object, created from this function and rendered in OpenScad, defined on the interval [-10,10] for both x and y. I chose level curves between -2 and 5 (inclusive). My object will have dimensions of 10 inches by 10 inches by 13 inches, but will be scaled down to a total width and depth of 3inches, and a total height of roughly 4 inches for ease of printing.



















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...