Skip to main content

Hyperboloid Parameterizations and Intersections



A quadric surface is defined by the set of all points which satisfy a value for a given equation, of three variables, of degree 2. 

A famous, through boring, example of a quadric surface is the sphere of a certain radius! For example, a sphere of radius 1 has the following form.

\[x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1\]

Referring back to the first statement, this means that the sphere is just all the points x, y, and z such that the sum of their squares is 1. This is a similar to a situation to a level curve. 

For a level curve, we have a function \(f(x,y)\) that maps points from the plane, also known as  \(\mathbb{R}^2\), to real space , which can be referred to as \(\mathbb{R} ^3\). We then find all values of \(f(x,y)\) that have a value, \(k\).
This is to say, 
\[f(x,y)=k\]

For a quadric surface, the motivation is the same. We now have a function \(F(x,y,z)\) which takes points from real space, (\(\mathbb{R}^3\)), and maps them to 4D space (\(\mathbb{R}^4\)).

However, that means nothing since we can't see 4D space, but we can see all points in 3D space that satisfy a value!
So, we can have: 
\[F(x,y,z)=k\]
It's the same principle as a level curve, and we now have a level surface!

I chose to look at a two-sheet hyperboloid. I find them quite interesting, because there is a space where no points can satisfy the criteria to define the surface, and so the surface is made of two separate parts.
 

(make surface in geogebra and paste here)


The two-sheet hyperboloid has the (rather ugly) general form:

\[\frac{x^2}{a^2}  + \frac{y^2}{b^2} - \frac{z^2}{c^2} = -1\]


For the sake of simplicity, and because of my love of palindromes, I chose \(a=2\), \(b=3\), and \(c=2\)

So, my surface has the form:
\[\frac{x^2}{4}  + \frac{y^2}{9} - \frac{z^2}{4} = -1\]
My surface also has the following shape:


However, it's evident that if we solve for z, we will not get a continuous equation. 
\[z =  \pm  \sqrt{4(\frac{x^2}{4}  + \frac{y^2}{9} +1)}\]

Unfortunately, this means the surface has to be parametrized so that it is completely continuous. The 2-sheet hyperboloid is defined by three parametric equations:

\[r(u,v)= x= a \sinh(u)  \cos(v) \\   y = b \sinh(u) \sin(v)  \\  z = c \cosh(u)\]

Given my constants, my surface will have the following form:

\[ x= 2 \sinh(u)  \cos(v) \\   y = 3 \sinh(u) \sin(v)  \\  z = 2 \cosh(u)\]

We can also slice a quadric surface with a plane to get a 2D intersection of the surface. A plane is defined as:

\[Ax + By + Cz + D= 0\]
The plane I will use to size my surface is defined by the normal vector\(<0,1,1>\)

My plane is thus:

\[y+z=0\]

The intersection forms a hyperbola, since it intersects my hyperboloid surface at 45 degrees. 

The equation of the resulting hyperbola is below, along with its graph
\[\frac{ x^2}{4} - \frac{5}{36}y^2 = -1\]



Interestingly, if we take the plane \(z+5=0\), we get an ellipse that has the equation 

\[\frac{x^2}{4} + \frac{y^2}{9} = \frac{21}{4}\]




Due to the inherent symmetry of the 2-sheet hyperboloid, I only need to render the upper half of it to generate a 3D representation. My print will span 48 millimeters in the x direction, and span roughly 30 millimeters in the y direction. It will be roughly 30 millimeters tall. Below I give the image of the 3D rendering of the surface and the intersection cut out. 




























Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...