Skip to main content

Hyperbola Hidden within a Hyperboloid

A quadric surface is a surface with the equation \(Ax^2+By^2+Cz^2+Dxy+Exz+Fyz+Gx+Hy+Iz+J=0\). Depending on which coefficients are negative, positive, and zero, you can get ellipses, paraboloids, cylinders, cones, and hyperboloids out of this equation. What is interesting about quadric surfaces is that if you take a cross section of the surface, you can get a conic section (ellipse, parabola, or hyperbola) depending on how it's cut. The equation of the cross section is \(Ax^2+By^2+Cxy+Dx+Ey+F=0\). The way you find the equation of the cross section is a bit complicated. First, the equation of the quadric surface has to be simplified. If there is any \(G, H\), or \(I\), you must complete the square with the corresponding \(A, B,\) or \(C\). For any \(D, E\), or \(F\), you must replace \(x,y\),and \(z\) with the parameterized versions and use a \(\theta\) or \(\phi\) that will cancel out the \(xy, xz,\) and \(yz\). After that, put the equation of the plane in the form \(Ax + By + Cz = D\) and solve for one of the variables. Then, replace the variable in the simplified quadric surface equation and now you have the equation of a conic section. If there is any \(C, D\), or \(E\) in the conic section equation, do the same thing as before to get rid of them. After that, you have a recognizable formula for the cross section of the quadric surface.
The quadric surface I chose was a hyperboloid of one sheet with the equation \(\frac{x^2}{2^2} + \frac{y^2}{1^2}-\frac{z^2}{.5^2}=1\). This hyperboloid is twice as long in the \(x\) direction and half as tall in the \(z\) direction compared to a standard hyperboloid of one sheet. The intersecting plane is \(x+y+z=0\) which is a plane perpendicular to the vector [1,1,1]. The way my plane intersects the hyperboloid creates a hyperbola. Solving for \(z\) in the plane equation gets me \(z=-x-y\). Plugging that into the hyperboloid equation gets me \(\frac{x^2}{2^2} + \frac{y^2}{1^2}-\frac{(-x-y)^2}{.5^2}=1\). Simplifying gets \(\frac{-15x^2}{4} - 3y^2-8xy=1\). There is no \(D\) or \(E\) in this equation, so we just have to replace \(x\) and \(y\) with their parameterizations which are \(x=x\cos\theta-y\sin\theta\) and \(y=x\sin\theta+y\cos\theta\). The \(\theta\) needed for this simplification is \(\frac{1}{2}*\cot{\frac{-8}{-3.75+3}}\). I have no clue how to represent that in a better way, so from now on, we're gonna use decimal values rounded to four places. After plugging \(\theta\) in and simplifying, the equation we end up with is \(-7.3925x^2+.6425y^2=1\). This is the equation of a thin hyperbola with the vertices close to each other and on the y axis.

  The reason I chose this quadric surface and intersection is because I think that hyperbolas are the least utilized conic section. Sure, circles, ellipses, and parabolas have more real world practicality, but hyperbolas can be used to locate a point given its distance to three other points. A circle can't do that. As for the quadric surface, a hyperboloid is just a hyperbola rotated about its axis. So now, I get to demonstrate how to find the cross section of a quadric surface using not only a hyperbola, but also what is basically a hyperbola in 3D. I chose the coefficients for the hyperboloid and the intersecting plane to make finding the conic section a little more challenging. A standard hyperboloid and a level plane would be able to demonstrate how conic sections are found, but adding coefficients brings in a few more obstacles to tackle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...