Skip to main content

Washer Method

The washer method is to slice an object into washer shaped slices, and then integrate over these slices to compute the volume of the object.

By rotating an ellipse around the y-axis, we can generate a torus whose volume can be calculated using the washer method.

The function of the selected ellipse is as following: \[\frac{(x-0.6)^2}{0.2^2}+\frac{(y-0.5)^2}{0.5^2}=1\] We can get a torus generated by rotating the selected ellipse around the y-axis.
It is feasible to use washer shaped slices stacked along the y-axis to approximate the torus.
We can calculate the area of the ring for each washer shaped slice, and then we compute the volume of the washer shaped slice by multiplying the area and the height of the washer shaped slice. The calculation process is shown in the following table:
From the table above we got the approximation of the volume is 1.145 cubic inches.

Use the following integral to calculate the real volume of the model \[V=\pi \times \int_0^1{\{(0.6+0.2 \times \sqrt{(1-4(y-0.5)^2 })^2-(0.6-0.2\times \sqrt {(1-4(y-0.5)^2 })^2 }\}dy\\ =\pi \times \frac{3(arcsin(2y-1)+\sqrt{(1-y)y}(4y-2))}{25}\bigg|_0^1\\ =\pi \times \frac{3\pi}{25}\\ =1.184\] The real volume of the torus is 1.184 cubic inchs. The difference between the approximated volume and the accurate volume is 1.184-1.145=0.039 cubic inches. The relative error is 0.039/1.184 ≈ 3.3%.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...