Skip to main content

Washer Method

The washer method is to slice an object into washer shaped slices, and then integrate over these slices to compute the volume of the object.

By rotating an ellipse around the y-axis, we can generate a torus whose volume can be calculated using the washer method.

The function of the selected ellipse is as following: \[\frac{(x-0.6)^2}{0.2^2}+\frac{(y-0.5)^2}{0.5^2}=1\] We can get a torus generated by rotating the selected ellipse around the y-axis.
It is feasible to use washer shaped slices stacked along the y-axis to approximate the torus.
We can calculate the area of the ring for each washer shaped slice, and then we compute the volume of the washer shaped slice by multiplying the area and the height of the washer shaped slice. The calculation process is shown in the following table:
From the table above we got the approximation of the volume is 1.145 cubic inches.

Use the following integral to calculate the real volume of the model \[V=\pi \times \int_0^1{\{(0.6+0.2 \times \sqrt{(1-4(y-0.5)^2 })^2-(0.6-0.2\times \sqrt {(1-4(y-0.5)^2 })^2 }\}dy\\ =\pi \times \frac{3(arcsin(2y-1)+\sqrt{(1-y)y}(4y-2))}{25}\bigg|_0^1\\ =\pi \times \frac{3\pi}{25}\\ =1.184\] The real volume of the torus is 1.184 cubic inchs. The difference between the approximated volume and the accurate volume is 1.184-1.145=0.039 cubic inches. The relative error is 0.039/1.184 ≈ 3.3%.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...
Post a Comment
Read more