Skip to main content

Volume with known Cross-Section

Think about you are cutting a steak to slide. What is so fantastic is that each slice of steak represents a cross-sectional area of the whole steak, which means when you put them together, you will get the volume of the solid steak.

Cross Section is a topic that we learn in Calculus II; it is common in daily life. However, it is not easy to do it in Calculus for a beginner. So, in this following Blog, I will use a 3-D model and other visual ways to introduce how to calculate the volume of a 3-Dimensional solid by taking an area and building up from that area using known cross-sections.

How to do this? I will use a example from calculus book to explain this. The flat base of a solid sits in the xy-plane in the region bounded by the graphs of y=0 and \(y=e^{−x}\) between \(x=0\) and \(x=1\).Find volume of this solid if cross-sections are perpendicular to the x-axis and they are squares. The following graph shows that the bounded function in 2-D.
Firstly, we could use the knowledge we have to approximate it, such that we could cut the function to 10 pieces that have the same high, 0.1. In order to calculate those pieces volumes, we could use the cross-sectional area multiple high, such that \[V = h A(x) = h (e^{-x})^2 \] IIn order to help us to visualize and understand the approximation, I built a 3D model, and I also calculated the volume of each part and added them together to get the total volume.
Frome the following approximation we could use intergral to calculate it, which will be more accurate, such that \[V = \int^1_0 A(x) dx = \int^1_0 (e^{-x})^2 dx\ = \int^1_0e^{-2x}dx = -\frac{1}{2}\int^1_0 e^{-2x}d(-2x) = -\frac{1}{2}e^{-2x}\bigg|^1_0 = -\frac{1}{2}(e^{-2}-1) \approx 0.4323\]To From the equation above, we know that the accurate volume of this solid is 0.4323. We could compare with the approximate we did in table 0.477. They are really closed. If we cut the pieces with smaller and smaller high, we will infinitely close the accurate answer.

Author: Yueqi Li (Nicole)
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...
Post a Comment
Read more