The Washer Method

When calculating the area under the curve, it may be easier to visualize splitting the curve into multiple rectangles. Then finding the area of each of those rectangles to sum them together for the total area. However, once these curves rotate around an axis, they become a 3D shape and the same struggle to find the volume occurs. Similarly, to calculate the volume of this type of solid, it may be easier to break it down into multiple flat or standardized disks (or if there is a hole they are known as washers). Then finding the volume of each disk (or washer) and sum together for the total volume. This would be known as the washer method.

Choosing a Basic Function

To best understand this concept, I chose a basic function $f(x)=x^{2}$ I chose this function because it is important to completely understand how a method works on the most standard equation before moving onto more complicated functions. Even though this is not the best example because it only shows the change in cylinder size inside the object, it still shows a good representation of how volume can be calculated while focusing only on one part.

Calculating Volume

Approximate Volume

Like we learned earlier, to find the approximate volume we will use the washer method. Therefore, we need to calculate the volume of each disk/washer in the object.

First, we must calculate the height of each washer. The interval is 1.5 inches long with 10 washers located inside that interval.

H = 1.5 / 10 = 0.15 inches

Heights are constant for each washer, so each washer will have a height of 0.15 inches.

Next, we will need to determine the radius for each washer. To do this we will take the outer radius and subtract the inner radius. The outer radius will always be 1.5 inches because there is a smooth curve on the outside of the object. For the inner radius we will use the function $x^{2}$ in terms of y (because the object is rotated about the y-axis), so $^{\sqrt{y}}$ . This leaves us with the following equation for each washer

$V = \prod (outer radius^{2}-inner radius^{2})(height)$

The following table calculates the volumes of every disk and washer.

Therefore, the total estimation of volume for this object is $7.422 in^{3}$ .

However, this is just an estimation because it is not a smooth curve.

Volume

To find a more accurate volume, we can take the integral of the curve. This would account for the smooth edges of the object compared to the sharp change in edges of the washers. The formula is the following,

$V =\prod \int_{0}^{2.25}{R(y)^{2}-{r(y)^{^{2}}}}dy$

Continuing this equation with the dimensions of our object

$V =\prod \int_{0}^{2.25}{1.5^{2}-{\sqrt{y}^{^{2}}}}dy$

$8.8357 in^{3}$

These volumes are close together proving that the first was just an estimation.

Comments

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the $x-y$ plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil A ruled surface is a surface that consists straight lines, called rulings, which lie upon the surface. These surfaces are formed of a set of points that are "swept" by a straight line. This is relatively intuitive once you see a good visual, but can be a bit abstract without that concrete example. A very basic example of a ruled surface is a cylinder; if we have a straight line and move it in a circle we create a cylinder made entirely of straight line. Note that the surface will only be a cylinder if all the lines are parallel. If the lines are not parallel we can create hyperboloids and cones depending on how much we have rotated. The rotation we are describing here is not a simple turning action, but more of a twisting motion—less like rotating a can by turning it and more like wringing out a washcloth by twisting it. Specifically, a cylinder is essentially two circles connected by rulings, if we keep one of the circles...

MA 391 Composition and Communication

Search This Blog