Skip to main content

The Washer Method

The Washer Method

    When calculating the area under the curve, it may be easier to visualize splitting the curve into multiple rectangles. Then finding the area of each of those rectangles to sum them together for the total area. However, once these curves rotate around an axis, they become a 3D shape and the same struggle to find the volume occurs. Similarly, to calculate the volume of this type of solid, it may be easier to break it down into multiple flat or standardized disks (or if there is a hole they are known as washers). Then finding the volume of each disk (or washer) and sum together for the total volume.  This would be known as the washer method. 

Choosing a Basic Function

To best understand this concept, I chose a basic function I chose this function because it is important to completely understand how a method works on the most standard equation before moving onto more complicated functions. Even though this is not the best example because it only shows the change in cylinder size inside the object, it still shows a good representation of how volume can be calculated while focusing only on one part. 


Calculating Volume

Approximate Volume

Like we learned earlier, to find the approximate volume we will use the washer method. Therefore, we need to calculate the volume of each disk/washer in the object. 

First, we must calculate the height of each washer. The interval is 1.5 inches long with 10 washers located inside that interval.

                                                H = 1.5 / 10 = 0.15 inches

Heights are constant for each washer, so each washer will have a height of 0.15 inches.

Next, we will need to determine the radius for each washer. To do this we will take the outer radius and subtract the inner radius. The outer radius will always be 1.5 inches because there is a smooth curve on the outside of the object. For the inner radius we will use the function in terms of y (because the object is rotated about the y-axis), so . This leaves us with the following equation for each washer

The following table calculates the volumes of every disk and washer.


Therefore, the total estimation of volume for this object is .

However, this is just an estimation because it is not a smooth curve. 

Volume 

To find a more accurate volume, we can take the integral of the curve. This would account for the smooth edges of the object compared to the sharp change in edges of the washers. The formula is the following, 

Continuing this equation with the dimensions of our object

 

 

These volumes are close together proving that the first was just an estimation.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...

Middle of Mass Measured from Moment

The center of mass of an object is the point that lies in the average position of mass in that object. For a normal polygon, that point is in the middle of the shape. However, if the shape is irregular, has concave angles, or has holes, the center of mass can be far from the middle of the object. Two things come into factor when determining the center of mass of an object. Weight and distance. Obviously, if one side of an object has more mass than the other, the center of mass will be on the heavier side. But, distance plays a role, too. If two sides of an object have the same mass, but one is farther from the middle, the center of mass will be on the side that has farther mass. Multiplying both of these factors together gives the moment of an object. Dividing the moment by the overall mass gives the location of the center of mass.   The reason I chose my shape is to mimic how those toy balancing birds work. The toy is a model bird with its wings outstretched. The ...