Skip to main content

Square-Cube Law Model

The equation I chose was \(\log_{10}x\) whose cross section is squares with side length x. My model is eleven horizontal square layers from y=0 to y=1.1. Each layer's side length is its smaller x value on the function.

  The reason I chose \(\log_{10}x\) is to demonstrate the square cube law. The bottom layer's side length is \(\frac{1}{10}\) the side length of the top layer, but the top layer has 100 times the area of the bottom layer. This is because of the square-cube law. If a shape's nth dimension grows by a factor, k, to make a similar object, its mth dimension grows by a factor of \(\sqrt[n]{k^{m}}\). My model's first layer increased by a factor of 10 in the 1st dimension. Area is used in the second dimension, so the increase in area is \(\sqrt[1]{10^{2}}\) or 100. The model's layers have constant height, so its volume increases by the same factor as its area. If its height was proportional to its side length, though, the volume would increase by a factor of \(\sqrt[1]{10^{3}}\) or 1000. This works for any two dimensions with either dimension being bigger or smaller. It is much easier to demonstrate it with the first three dimensions, though, because those are the dimensions we can easily picture in our heads.
  If you know about integrals, you know that integrals essentially add up the infinetesimally small areas of lines under a function to find the total area under the function. You know the height of the line is the y value on the function. The volume of a solid with known cross-sectional area can be calculated similarly. My solid has a cross-sectional area of a square whose side length is the x value of the function. My solid can be divided horizontally an infinite number of times until each slice has an infinitesimally small height. If the length and depth of each slice can be figured out, the volume of each slice can be added up to find the total volume. And in my solid, the cross-sectional area of each slice is its x value squared, so its length and depth is each slice's x value. So, the volume of the solid can be figured out by squaring each x value and multipling it by the height, dy, across the integral.
  To calculate the volume of the real solid, I used the logarithm's inverse, \(10^x\) so that the integral can be taken using dx instead of dy. The integral is taken from 0 to 1.1. \[\int_0^{1.1}(10^x)^2dx\] This integral turns out to equal 34.198.
  The equation to calculate the volume of the model is \(\sum_{n=0}^{10} ((10^{.1*n})^2*.1)\) which turns out to be 26.926. The equation takes each layer's x value, squares it, and multiplies it by its height, .1, to get the volume of each layer and then adds them all together. It makes sense that the approximation is less than the real volume because the approximation uses the lesser of the two values of each layer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil A ruled surface is a surface that consists straight lines, called rulings, which lie upon the surface. These surfaces are formed of a set of points that are "swept" by a straight line. This is relatively intuitive once you see a good visual, but can be a bit abstract without that concrete example. A very basic example of a ruled surface is a cylinder; if we have a straight line and move it in a circle we create a cylinder made entirely of straight line. Note that the surface will only be a cylinder if all the lines are parallel. If the lines are not parallel we can create hyperboloids and cones depending on how much we have rotated. The rotation we are describing here is not a simple turning action, but more of a twisting motion—less like rotating a can by turning it and more like wringing out a washcloth by twisting it. Specifically, a cylinder is essentially two circles connected by rulings, if we keep one of the circles...