Skip to main content

Solids of Known Cross Section : Toaster

Solids of Known Cross Section : Toaster

Calculating the volume of "irregular" solids—as opposed to regular solids such as rectangular prisms, a square pyramid, etc.—can be difficult. We have previously reviewed solids of revolution and a method of obtaining the volume of one such solid, specifically the method of volumes by cylindrical shells. This method is useful for finding the volumes of "round" or "circular" solids—i.e. those that have been revolved about an axis; while the formulas for the volumes of spheres and cones are known we can easily approximate their volumes via the washer or shell methods, furthermore, the volumes of solids whose volumes are unknown—like an egg, doorknob, or lampshade—can also be easily approximated using these methods. We are now examining other solids that have not been revolved about an axis or are not "round" such as a roof or an eye glasses case. In order to approximate the volume of solids like these it is necessary for the solid to have a known cross section or, more plainly, a slice parallel to an axis that has a known or easily calculated area. Ideally, the slices from our solid will be regular polygons or ellipses, as that will make approximating volume easier.

Method

An approximation of a solid of known cross section found by "slicing" the solid and summing the volume of each slice is only so accurate. An accurate volume can be found in the same method as for a solid of revolution, integration—this follows as every solid of revolution is technically a solid of known cross section, or solids of revolution are special cases of solids of known cross section. The volume of a solid of known cross section can be found using the following ingteration: \[ V = \int_{a}^b A(x)dx, \] where \( V \) is volume, \(A(x)\) is the area of a cross section of the solid, and \(x\) lies between \(a\) and \(b\). This is the same as if we had infinitely many incredibly thin cross sections summed together, which gives a more accurate measure as each cross section is a much better fit than our approximation. Note that we are slicing along the \(x\)-axis, if we integrated in terms of \(y\) we would be slicing along the \(y\)-axis.

The Best Thing Since Sliced Bread

When thinking of solids that are commonly sliced I immediately thought of bread, but determined that a solid with a simpler cross section would be easier to think about, approximate a volume for using cross sections, integrate to find the actual volume, and model with a 3-D printed object. Thus, I landed on a toaster. So, I found a toaster and measure its length \( (L) \), width \( (W) \), and height \( (H) \); as well as observing its general form; and determined the following measurements, which I then scaled down to make them easier to handle. Those measurements are as follows: \[{ L = 12.8" \rightarrow 1" \\ W = 8" \rightarrow 0.625" \\ H = 9" \rightarrow 0.703" }\] Additionally, we must also consider the shape of the base of the toaster as well as the curve that makes of the top of the toaster. The base of the toaster is the area that lies between the following two curves: \[{ y = (0.5^6 - (x-0.5)^6)^{\frac{1}{6}} - 0.1875 (1)\\ y = -(0.5^6 - (x-0.5)^6)^{\frac{1}{6}} + 0.1875 (2). }\] And the curve that makes up the top of the toaster is the following: \[ y = (0.5^6 - (x-0.5)^6)^{\frac{1}{6}} + 0.203 (3). \] These next images show the toaster I modeled my solid of known cross section, the graph of toaster's base (in red), and the curve that makes up the top of the toaster (in black).

Note that the cross sections of this solid were taken to be rectangles whose length was 0.1" in order to slice the solid 10 times, the width of each slice was determined by adding the outputs of equations (1) and (2) when inputting the \(x\) value that corresponded to that cross sections—i.e. the cross section that occurred at 0.1", 0.2", etc.—and the height of each slice was determined by inputting that same \(x\) value into equation (3). The results of those calculations can be found in the following table, as well as the volume of each cross section, and the sum of the volumes of the cross sections that gives the approximated total volume of the toaster—note, all values in the table have been scaled back to their original values by multiplying by a scalar of 12.8".

Knowing that our cross sections are rectangles as well as the length, width, and height of each cross section allows us to create a 3-D model of our toaster approximation the looks like the following image, with a dimension drawing following that. Note that the two vertical indentions in the model are there to show the slices and separate the cross sections; the volume lost to these indentions is ignored as they have been added later for clarity.

We can now go about finding the actual volume of the solid by performing the following integration, where \(V\) is volume: \[ V = \int_{0}^1 [((0.5^6 - (x-0.5)^6)^{\frac{1}{6}} - 0.1875) + (-(0.5^6 - (x-0.5)^6)^{\frac{1}{6}} + 0.1875)][(0.5^6 - (x-0.5)^6)^{\frac{1}{6}} + 0.203]dx. \] When integrated correctly this integral equals approximately \( \displaystyle 0.4033 \text{ in}^3 \); which must then be scaled back to our original dimensions, this is done by multiplying the above result by \( 12.8^3 \) as each of the three elements of the area calculation must be scaled back to the original, which yields a volume of \( \displaystyle 845.7372 \text{ in}^3 \). This volume makes since as our approximation using known cross sections yielded a volume of \( \displaystyle 805.100 \text{ in}^3 \); which is about \( 95 \% \) of our actual volume—found via integration—and this tells us that the approximation of the volume of a solid of known cross section is really very accurate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil A ruled surface is a surface that consists straight lines, called rulings, which lie upon the surface. These surfaces are formed of a set of points that are "swept" by a straight line. This is relatively intuitive once you see a good visual, but can be a bit abstract without that concrete example. A very basic example of a ruled surface is a cylinder; if we have a straight line and move it in a circle we create a cylinder made entirely of straight line. Note that the surface will only be a cylinder if all the lines are parallel. If the lines are not parallel we can create hyperboloids and cones depending on how much we have rotated. The rotation we are describing here is not a simple turning action, but more of a twisting motion—less like rotating a can by turning it and more like wringing out a washcloth by twisting it. Specifically, a cylinder is essentially two circles connected by rulings, if we keep one of the circles...