Skip to main content

Shells Method

Shells and washers can both be used to measure the volume of a region. Volume is used on a 3-dimensional object. To change a 2-dimensional figure to a 3-dimensional figure we revolve the functions we have around the y-axis or the x-axis. To show this I will be using the shells method with the functions \[y=x^3-2x\] and \[y=-x^2\] I will be revolving the region between \[0 ≤ x ≤ 1\] about the y-axis. The functions are graphed in the image below.



Using the shells method we would make rectangles parallel to the axis of rotation. For this example we are using the y-axis so the rectangles would be vertical. The more rectangles we make the better the approximation would be for the volume of the object. Revolving these rectangles around the y-axis would make a shell like object. I have made 10 rectangles and revolved it around the y-axis which is shown in the image below. In the image we can see that that the heights of each shell varies and the radius is getting larger by a constant number. The dimensions of the final product will be 4.549 by .909 cubic inches.



I will be measuring the volume of the actual function and I will be comparing it to the volume of the shell model. To measure the actual volume of this function the following formlula would be used \[V = \int_a^b 2*\pi *r*h\] where the r is the radius and h is the height and the points a and b represent the starting and ending points of the region. The radius and the points a and b are all using the x values because we have revolved the region around the y-axis. The height would be the difference of the two functions. The difference can be found by using the function on top and subtracting it with the function on bottom. Using this formula we get \[V = \int_0^1 2*\pi *x*(-x^2-x^3+2) = 1.361\]

Now to compare we can take the volume of each shell to see the difference of the actual volume and our model. The formula to find the volume of the shells is \[V = 2*\pi *r*h*\Delta r\] Where r is the radius, h is the height and \( \displaystyle \Delta\) r is the change of radius (thickness of shell). The table below shows the volume calculated for each shell and the total volume when added together. The total volume approximated for the shells was 1.336. The approximation found from the shells is very close to the actual approximation found which was to be 1.361.



You may ask why were these functions chosen. The first reason is that these functions are easy for someone with a minimal math background to visualize. Being able to visualize the 2-dimensional function can help when trying to visualize the 3-dimensional object. I chose to use two functions because they created steps on the outside of my object and steps on the inside. Being able to see the steps on the outside can be helpful to imagine what is happening on the inside. For someone trying to newly learn this topic these functions would give a good idea on how everything works rather than focusing on the actual math used in the process.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Approximation of a Solid of Revolution

Most math teachers I've had have been able to break down Calculus into two very broad categories: derivatives and integrals. What is truly amazing, is how much you can do with these two tools. By using integration, it is possible to approximate the shape of a 2-D function that is rotated around an axis. This solid created from the rotation is known as a solid of revolution. To explain this concept, we will take a look at the region bounded by the two functions: \[ f(x) = 2^{.25x} - 1 \] and \[ g(x) = e^{.25x} - 1 \] bounded at the line y = 1. This region is meant to represent a cross section of a small bowl. While it may not perfectly represent this practical object, the approximation will be quite textured, and will provide insight into how the process works. The region bounded by the two functions can be rotated around the y-axis to create a fully solid object. This is easy enough to talk about, but what exactly does this new solid look like? Is...
8 comments
Read more

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knot Your Average Knot

Knots are an object that we come across in our everyday lives. From tying our shoes to tying a mask around the back of our head, tying and creating knots is something that we begin to become exposed to at a very early age. For our final project for the semester, we decided to go more in-depth into knots and see what information we can get out of our individual knots. To begin, I will show you my knot that I chose to use for this project, and then we will go into all of the interesting information we can pull out of it! My Knot: My knot is a knot with ten crossings, on the atlas you will find it with the name 10 38, which is the number of times you see the strand go beneath itself. Throughout this post, we will go in-depth into a couple of different things we can find out about this particular knot, this list being: finding a way to make it into the unknot, attempting a coloring of the knot, finding the writhe of the knot, and breaking this knot down in...
Post a Comment
Read more