Skip to main content

Shells Method

Shells and washers can both be used to measure the volume of a region. Volume is used on a 3-dimensional object. To change a 2-dimensional figure to a 3-dimensional figure we revolve the functions we have around the y-axis or the x-axis. To show this I will be using the shells method with the functions \[y=x^3-2x\] and \[y=-x^2\] I will be revolving the region between \[0 ≤ x ≤ 1\] about the y-axis. The functions are graphed in the image below.



Using the shells method we would make rectangles parallel to the axis of rotation. For this example we are using the y-axis so the rectangles would be vertical. The more rectangles we make the better the approximation would be for the volume of the object. Revolving these rectangles around the y-axis would make a shell like object. I have made 10 rectangles and revolved it around the y-axis which is shown in the image below. In the image we can see that that the heights of each shell varies and the radius is getting larger by a constant number. The dimensions of the final product will be 4.549 by .909 cubic inches.



I will be measuring the volume of the actual function and I will be comparing it to the volume of the shell model. To measure the actual volume of this function the following formlula would be used \[V = \int_a^b 2*\pi *r*h\] where the r is the radius and h is the height and the points a and b represent the starting and ending points of the region. The radius and the points a and b are all using the x values because we have revolved the region around the y-axis. The height would be the difference of the two functions. The difference can be found by using the function on top and subtracting it with the function on bottom. Using this formula we get \[V = \int_0^1 2*\pi *x*(-x^2-x^3+2) = 1.361\]

Now to compare we can take the volume of each shell to see the difference of the actual volume and our model. The formula to find the volume of the shells is \[V = 2*\pi *r*h*\Delta r\] Where r is the radius, h is the height and \( \displaystyle \Delta\) r is the change of radius (thickness of shell). The table below shows the volume calculated for each shell and the total volume when added together. The total volume approximated for the shells was 1.336. The approximation found from the shells is very close to the actual approximation found which was to be 1.361.



You may ask why were these functions chosen. The first reason is that these functions are easy for someone with a minimal math background to visualize. Being able to visualize the 2-dimensional function can help when trying to visualize the 3-dimensional object. I chose to use two functions because they created steps on the outside of my object and steps on the inside. Being able to see the steps on the outside can be helpful to imagine what is happening on the inside. For someone trying to newly learn this topic these functions would give a good idea on how everything works rather than focusing on the actual math used in the process.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil

Ruled Surfaces : Trefoil A ruled surface is a surface that consists straight lines, called rulings, which lie upon the surface. These surfaces are formed of a set of points that are "swept" by a straight line. This is relatively intuitive once you see a good visual, but can be a bit abstract without that concrete example. A very basic example of a ruled surface is a cylinder; if we have a straight line and move it in a circle we create a cylinder made entirely of straight line. Note that the surface will only be a cylinder if all the lines are parallel. If the lines are not parallel we can create hyperboloids and cones depending on how much we have rotated. The rotation we are describing here is not a simple turning action, but more of a twisting motion—less like rotating a can by turning it and more like wringing out a washcloth by twisting it. Specifically, a cylinder is essentially two circles connected by rulings, if we keep one of the circles...