Skip to main content

Shells Method

Shells and washers can both be used to measure the volume of a region. Volume is used on a 3-dimensional object. To change a 2-dimensional figure to a 3-dimensional figure we revolve the functions we have around the y-axis or the x-axis. To show this I will be using the shells method with the functions \[y=x^3-2x\] and \[y=-x^2\] I will be revolving the region between \[0 ≤ x ≤ 1\] about the y-axis. The functions are graphed in the image below.



Using the shells method we would make rectangles parallel to the axis of rotation. For this example we are using the y-axis so the rectangles would be vertical. The more rectangles we make the better the approximation would be for the volume of the object. Revolving these rectangles around the y-axis would make a shell like object. I have made 10 rectangles and revolved it around the y-axis which is shown in the image below. In the image we can see that that the heights of each shell varies and the radius is getting larger by a constant number. The dimensions of the final product will be 4.549 by .909 cubic inches.



I will be measuring the volume of the actual function and I will be comparing it to the volume of the shell model. To measure the actual volume of this function the following formlula would be used \[V = \int_a^b 2*\pi *r*h\] where the r is the radius and h is the height and the points a and b represent the starting and ending points of the region. The radius and the points a and b are all using the x values because we have revolved the region around the y-axis. The height would be the difference of the two functions. The difference can be found by using the function on top and subtracting it with the function on bottom. Using this formula we get \[V = \int_0^1 2*\pi *x*(-x^2-x^3+2) = 1.361\]

Now to compare we can take the volume of each shell to see the difference of the actual volume and our model. The formula to find the volume of the shells is \[V = 2*\pi *r*h*\Delta r\] Where r is the radius, h is the height and \( \displaystyle \Delta\) r is the change of radius (thickness of shell). The table below shows the volume calculated for each shell and the total volume when added together. The total volume approximated for the shells was 1.336. The approximation found from the shells is very close to the actual approximation found which was to be 1.361.



You may ask why were these functions chosen. The first reason is that these functions are easy for someone with a minimal math background to visualize. Being able to visualize the 2-dimensional function can help when trying to visualize the 3-dimensional object. I chose to use two functions because they created steps on the outside of my object and steps on the inside. Being able to see the steps on the outside can be helpful to imagine what is happening on the inside. For someone trying to newly learn this topic these functions would give a good idea on how everything works rather than focusing on the actual math used in the process.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...
Post a Comment
Read more

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...
Post a Comment
Read more