Skip to main content

Integration Over the Rectangle

In the previous blog, we learned how to use single integral to calculate the volume and center of mass. For single integrals, the region over which we integrate is always an interval. (i.e. a one-dimensional space)

In this blog we are intereted in integrating a function of two variables \(f(x,y)\). With functions of two variable we integrated over a region of \(\mathbb{R}^2\) (i.e. a two-dimensional space). We will start out by assuming that the region in \(\mathbb{R}^2\) is a rectangle which we will denote as \(R=[a,b]\times [c,d]\). This means that the ranges for \(x\) and \(y\) are \(a\leq x\leq b\), and \(c \leq y\leq d\). Also let's assume \(f(x,y) \geq 0\). The graph of \(f\) is a aurface with equation \(z=f(x,y)\)
Our goal is to find the volume between surface and \(R\). First, we want to approximate it. We divide up \(R\) into a series of smaller rectangles, such that divide up \(a\leq x\leq b\) into \(n\)subintervals and divide up \(c \leq y\leq d\) into \(m\) subintervals, we denote each rectangle as \((x_i, y_j)\). Then, we will construct a box whose height is given by \(f(x_i, y_j)\) over each of these smaller rectangles. Then, each of rectangle has a base \(\Delta A\) and a height of \(f(x_i, y_j)\), so we have the volume of each boxes will be \(f(x_i, y_j) \Delta A\). The volume under \(S\) will be approximately equal to the following: \[ V \approx \sum^n_{i=1} \sum^m_{j=1} f(x_i, y_j) \Delta A\] Our intuition tells us that if the approximation becomes better as \(m\) and \(n\) become larger, we would expect that : \[ V = \lim _{m, n \to \infty} \sum^n_{i=1} \sum^m_{j=1} f(x_i, y_j) \Delta A\] It looks like the function of single integral's definition. In fact, it is the definition of double integrals. It can be written as: The double integral of \(f\) over the rectangle \(R\) is \[V= \int \int_Rf(x,y)dA = \lim _{m, n \to \infty} \sum^n_{i=1} \sum^m_{j=1} f(x_i, y_j) \Delta A\] if this limit exists. Let's use an example to learn how we use double integral to find the volume below the function and above the rectangle and how we compute double integrals.
Calculate the solid volume that lies above the square \(R=[0,2]\times[0,2]\) and below the paraboloid \(z=16-x^2-2y^2\).
First, Let's sketch this paraboloid and the square.
We want to approximate the volume of the solid. First, let's divide 100 equal squares, which means \(n=m=10\).Then we know the \(\Delta A = 0.2\times 0.2 = 0.04\) and the height of boxes will be following:
We could use 3D printer to print the model as follwoing:
Now, we know the base and height of each box, we could approximate the total volume of this solid as following: \[V \approx \sum^{10}_{i=1} \sum^{10}_{j=1} f(x_i, y_j) \Delta A = 45.52\] Let's use integral to calculate it to get an accurate result. \[\begin{split} V &=\int\int_R f(x,y) dA = \int^2_0 \int^2_0 16-x^2-2y^2 dx dy\\ &= \int^2_0 \left[16x-\frac{x^3}{3} -2xy \bigg|^{x=2}_{x=0}\right]dy = \int^2_0 32-\frac{8}{3}-4y dy \\ &= 32y-\frac{8}{3}y-4\frac{y^3}{3} \bigg |^{y=2}_{y=0} = 64-\frac{16}{3}-\frac{32}{3} \\ &= 48 \end{split} \] Comparing the approximation result with the actual result, they are closed.

I choose this function because it is an easy example for beginners to learn how to integrate over the rectangle. After they know how to integrate over the rectangle, they could continue learning how to integrate over the general regions in two dimensions.

Fig. 1 Double Integrals over Rectangles. (2020, November 10). Retrieved September 27, 2021, from https://math.libretexts.org/@go/page/4545

Author: Yueqi Li (Nicole)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...