Skip to main content

Cross Section

Introduction
By finding the volume of a solid that has known cross-sections we go way back to some of our very early years of math. With cross-sections, we visit some very common shapes such as: triangles, semi-circles, rectangles and squares, and other polygons. Today we will be specifically looking at triangles. The process for finding the volume of a solid is rather simple. We are going to sketch the cross-section of the function and then express the area as a function. After, we are going to determine the limits of integration and integrate the definite integral.
Cross Section?
There are a variety of different shapes that you can conduct the volume of a solid using cross-sections. For simplicity, I am going to conduct the volume of a solid using triangles as my cross-sections. In my example, I am going to be using two functions. The first function is \(g(x)=\frac{1}{2}x^2\) and the second function is \(f(x)=x^2\).
First, let's analyze this graph of \(g(x\)) and \(f(x\)). Although the functions do not intersect, we are still able to take the cross-sections to find the volume of the solid. We will be dividing our solid into 10 steps which would result in 10 equilateral triangles. By stacking equilateral triangles on top of one another and adding the volumes of each triangle up, we can approximate the volume of the solid. From the graph, we are going to be taking the cross-sections between the interval of \(1≤x≤2\). This would result in our triangles to have a 0.1 width for every step. Since we are using equilateral triangles, we will have to use the area of a equilateral triangle when we approximate.
Approximating and Computing with Cross Sections
As stated previously, to find the volume of a solid that has known cross-sections as triangles is rather simple. We are going to stack 10 equilateral triangles on top of each other, and then add the volume of each triangle up to approximate the total volume of the solid. Since our solid is bounded between \(1≤x≤2\) we are going to have 10 equilateral triangles with width 0.1. By taking the area of an equilateral triangle \[Area = \frac{\sqrt3}{4}s^2\] where \(s\) is the length of the sides. Then, once we compute the area of the equilateral triangle we will then multiply it by 0.1 since that is the length of each step, and thus the width of each triangle. By doing this, we will get the total volume of the solid. Below is the table for our approximation.
This gave us an approximation of \(Volume = 0.593 units^3\)
Next, to calculate the accurate volume of the solid, we need to integrate. Using the formula from earlier, \[Area = \frac{\sqrt3}{4}s^2\] we will slightly modify it to include the two functions. The full integral is: \[\frac{\sqrt3}{4}\int_a^b(f(x)-g(x))^2dx\] In this equation \(g(x\)) is \(\frac{1}{2}x^2\) and \(f(x\)) is \(x^2\) which are integrated from the range 1 to 2. Substituting the functions and the bounds in, we get the integral: \[\frac{\sqrt3}{4}\int_1^2((\frac{1}{2}x^2)-(x^2))^2dx\] Evaluating the integral we then get: \[\frac{\sqrt3}{4}\int_1^2((\frac{1}{2}x^2)-(x^2))^2dx \rightarrow \frac{\sqrt3}{4}\int_1^2(-\frac{x^2}{2})^2dx \rightarrow \frac{\sqrt3}{4}\int_1^2(\frac{x^4}{4})dx \rightarrow \frac{\sqrt3}{4}(\frac{x^5}{20})\] \[\frac{\sqrt3}{4}(\frac{x^5}{20}) \rightarrow \frac{\sqrt3}{4}((\frac{2^5}{20})-(\frac{1^5}{20}) \rightarrow \frac{\sqrt3}{4}\cdot\frac{31}{20} = \frac{31\sqrt3}{80}\] \[= 0.67116 units^3\] Why These Functions?
These functions were chosen for a few reasons. For someone who is just starting to learn this topic about finding the volume of a solid with known cross-sections, understanding the concept is more important than remembering the integration, etc. Thus, I chose these functions due to the integration being rather easy. This would allow someone to focus more on the concept, and being able to further understand cross-sections than focusing on the integration. Also, I chose to use equilateral triangles as my cross-sections due to my opinion of triangles being an easy shape to understand the concept with. The area of an equilateral triangle is rather easy too. I believe that using equilateral triangles allow for someone to better grasp the concept than using a more difficult shape for my cross-sections. I believe that the hardest part when learning cross-sections as well as most of calculus is being able to visualize the concept. Being a visual learner myself, being able to visualize a concept helps a lot, thus using triangles to keep simplicity was imperative when choosing my cross-functions and the functions used allow for someone to easily visualize the solid.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...

Middle of Mass Measured from Moment

The center of mass of an object is the point that lies in the average position of mass in that object. For a normal polygon, that point is in the middle of the shape. However, if the shape is irregular, has concave angles, or has holes, the center of mass can be far from the middle of the object. Two things come into factor when determining the center of mass of an object. Weight and distance. Obviously, if one side of an object has more mass than the other, the center of mass will be on the heavier side. But, distance plays a role, too. If two sides of an object have the same mass, but one is farther from the middle, the center of mass will be on the side that has farther mass. Multiplying both of these factors together gives the moment of an object. Dividing the moment by the overall mass gives the location of the center of mass.   The reason I chose my shape is to mimic how those toy balancing birds work. The toy is a model bird with its wings outstretched. The ...