Skip to main content

Conical squares

A function with two variables can be pictured by making the value of the function a third axis. If the function consists of x and y, the value is z. This turns an area over a plane into a 3 dimensional object. Two integrals are needed to integrate two variable functions defined over a region. The first integral is with respect to one of the variables and the second is with respect to the other. The bounds are the area that is being integrated. Sometimes, that requires the bounds of the inner integral to be a function of the outer variable. Finding the antiderivitive of the function is the same as any other function, only you treat the variable not being integrated as a constant. Once you find the antiderivitive, replace the variable that was integrated with the bounds like you normally would and integrate that new function with respect to the other variable. What you are left with is the value of the function integrated over the area.
  The function I chose to integrate is \(\sqrt{y^2-x^2}\). It is integrated over the area bounded by \(y=|x|\) and \(y=4\). This function makes half a cone in the 3d space. In fact, it is the same shape made by rotating \(y=x\) halfway around the y axis. So, the area of the solid could be found by using known cross section, but we're going to do it the other way to learn how to use two integrals. I chose it to show how the large change in slope of a circle. The height of each rectangular prism in each row gets shorter by a larger factor the closer to the outside it is. The height suddenly drops to zero in each row, showing how big of a change the slope is as you get to the edge of the circle.

  I approximated the volume by using 20 squares on the xy plane and using the function's value in the top middle of the square as its height. The area of each square is 1, so its value is its volume. The y value of each point goes from 1 to 4 and the x value goes from \(-(y-.5)\)to \(y-.5\) both with increments of 1. A formula to find the volume of the approximation is \[\sum_{y=1}^4{\sum_{x=-y+1}^{y}{\sqrt{y^2-(x-.5)^2}}}\] This comes to equal 48.151.
  Because the lower bounds of my area is |x|, my integration needs to be split into two parts. One with the inner integral bounds as x and 4 and one with the bounds as -x and 4. The function and the bounds are symmetric, though, so each of the parts equals one half of the actual value. So, we can just do one of the parts and multiply it by 2. The two integrals required are \[2*\int_{0}^4{\int_x^4{\sqrt{y^2-x^2}}dy}dx\] Finding the antiderivitive of the function and replacing the y's with the the bounds gets you \[2*\int_0^4{(.5(4\sqrt{4^2-x^2}-x^2\ln{(\sqrt{4^2-x^2}+4)})-.5(-x^2\ln{x}))}dx\] Finally, solving that integral and multiplying by 2 gets you 33.51. It makes sense that the approximation's value is bigger than the actual value because the rectangular prisms in the approximation had heights that were taller than the average height each square would have in the actual solid.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...