Skip to main content

Center of Mass

This week, we are diving into the Center of Mass of an object! The method of finding the Center of Mass of an object goes with our theme of integration. The Center of Mass of an object is very literal in its meaning, it is the position in which the relative distance of masses from that point sum to zero. For example, a square with uniform mass has a center of mass directly in the middle of the square.

The Center of Mass of an object can be calculated by finding the Moments about the X and Y axis of the object and dividing by the total mass of the system. This is true for something on a plan, if you are dealing with just a line then you only have moments at the points on the line. The Moment about the X-Axis, denoted as $M_x$, is the sum of each mass at each point in terms of the y values. Following from this, the Moment about the Y-Axis, denoted as $M_y$, is the sum of each mass at each point in terms of the x values. To find the Center of Mass, or COM,, you use the following formula, where M is the total mass of the system:

$COM = (\frac{M_y}{M}, \frac{M_x}{M})$

If we take a region with a uniform density, lets call it $\rho$, then we calculate the Mass, $M_x$ and $M_y$ by the given formulas.

Mass = $\int_{a}^{b} \rho * (f(x) - g(x)) dx$ (You can also use the y's instead!)

$M_x = \int_{c}^{d} \rho * y * (f(y) - g(y)) dy $

$M_x = \int_{a}^{b} \rho * x * (f(x) - g(x)) dx $

Here, we get the Center of Mass, COM, is a point in the X-Y Plane. From now on, we will refer to the x-coordinate and the y-coordinate of the COM by $\bar{x},
\bar{y}$ respectively. Now that we have most of the ground work done, we will look at the equation I decided to dive into this week. I did not want to do anything super crazy, since coming up with interesting shapes can be hard when doing COM. So instead, I wanted to look at the difference of shaving a little bit off of a symmetrical shape. Today, we will look at the following equations:

$2|x| -2x = 16$ and $x=4$ enclosed by the lines $y=-4,
y=4$

Below is the graph of these! The area with the dashed dark lines showcase the area that we are interested in!


These equations make a square that has had a smaller square and two triangles cut out. In order to find the Center of Mass of this object, we will have to split up the integrals based on the shapes of that region. For $M_y$, we can see that we have one rectangle, and two different triangles. Thus, we will take the integrals of those regions and sum them up.

$\it{Math Time!}$

$M_y = \int_{-4}^{\frac{-4}{3}} (\rho * 8x )dx + \int_{\frac{-4}{3}}^{0} (\rho * x(-3x))dx + \int_{0}^{4} (\rho * x(-x) )dx$

Here, we will discuss each of the three integrals individually. The 8 in the first integral is the area of the rectangle enclosed by the bounds given. The second integral is based on the line containing the points: ($\frac{-4}{3}, 4$) & (0,0) which gives us the line $y= -3x$. Same idea is the reason for the third integral, where the line contains points (0,0) & (4, -4), giving us the line $y= -x$.

By solving through the three integrals and adding them up, we find that:

$M_y = \frac{-2048\rho}{27}$.

Now lets switch to $M_x$, which is found by the following four integrals:

$M_x = \int_{-4}^{4} (\rho *y * \frac{8}{3})dy + \int_{-4}^{0} (\rho * y * \frac{4}{3})dy + \int_{0}^{4} (\rho * y * \frac{y}{-3})dy + \int_{-4}^{0} (.5 * \rho * y * 4)dy$

We follow this process from before of finding the areas of the shapes now with respect to the x-axis with the constraints of the bounds. Solving through these four integrals, we arrive at following:

$M_x = \frac{-304\rho}{9}$

Our last step is to solve for the Mass! We will do the four integrals we just worked through for this, besides having that outside y. So the Mass has the following sum of integration's:

Mass $= \int_{-4}^{4} (\rho * \frac{8}{3})dy + \int_{-4}^{0} (\rho * \frac{4}{3})dy + \int_{0}^{4} (\rho *\frac{y}{-3})dy + \int_{-4}^{0} (.5 * \rho * 4)dy$

Solving through, we arrive at:

Mass $= 32\rho$

Now we have everything to have an actual point on the object for its center of mass! By substituting in the formula from before, the COM is:

COM $ = (\frac{\frac{-2048\rho}{27}}{32\rho}, \frac{\frac{-304\rho}{9}}{32\rho})$

COM $ = (\frac{-64}{27}, \frac{-19}{18})$

Below is the OnShape File of the construction of this, along with a small hole where the Center of Mass is!


So, we see that the center of mass is slightly below $y = -1$ and a little past $x = -2$, which makes sense because we have that larger mass on the bottom right of the object. If we did not have the smaller triangle in the top left of the object and instead the triangle was the same size as the larger one, the COM would have been (-1.33, -1.33). By making the triangle smaller on the top right right, we see that the COM gets shift up and to the left since we lost mass at the top left.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...