Skip to main content

Area under a region

 

If you want to find the area under a region, you can draw rectangles and add the area of the rectangles together to find an aproximation. If you want to find the exact area, you use an integral bounded by the region. But what about when we introduce a 3rd plane? How do we aproximate the volume under a region when we consider all three planes? The concept is very similar. To aproximate the volume, we use rectangles but add the element of height and sum the rectangles volumes. For the actual volume, we use a double integral (using Fubini's Theorem) bounded by the region.
Consider the region contained in the intersection of \[y=x^\frac{1}{2}\] \(and\) \[y=x^3.\]

We are going to aproximate and find the actual volume of this region under the function \[f(x,y)=xy.\]

We're going to find the aproximated area using squares, so let's zoom in a little bit until we have a 5x5 area for a total of 25 squares to work with.

Do you see the 5x5 section of squares that outline the region contained by the two functions? Each block is 0.2x0.2 wide/long. What we want to do is look at the top right corner of each square in the grid. For any top right corner of a square that is on the line of a function or contained inside the region of the functions, we notate them.

What are the coordinates of these points? We will need them for the function \(f(x,y)=xy.\)

Now, we simply plug these coordinates into the \(f(x,y)=xy\) function and input these numbers into a 5x5 table on google sheets. This table will make it easier to visualize what's going on as we input these numbers as heights on onshape to represent whats happening in 3-d. These are the heights of each square, now turned into rectangular prisms. To find the volume of these prisms, we take the length (0.2) times the width (0.2) of each square and multiply it by the height and take the total sum to get the aproximated voolume of this region, noted below the table.

The representation on Onshape is done in a 1:1 scale using inches as metrics, meaning each square has side length and width 0.2 and the heights are exactly as they are in the table.

To find the actual volume of the region we use a double integral. The outside integral is the integral from x=0 to x=1, or the boundary of the region with respect to the x-axis. The inner integral is the integral from \(y=x^3\) to \(y=x^\frac{1}{2}\) or the area bounded by the bottom equation up to the area bounded by the upper equation. This double integral gives us the volume of the region in all 3 planes by the function \(f(x,y)=xy\) contained or bounded by the functions in the 2-dimensions with respect to the y-axis contained in-between the functions and then the x-axis in-between the inner and outer-most point from the origin along the x-axis. \[\int_{}^{}\int_{D}^{}f(x,y)dA\] \[\int_{}^{}\int_{R}^{}f(x,y)dydx\] \[\int_{a}^{b}\int_{c}^{d}f(x,y)dydx\] \[\int_{a}^{b}\int_{g1(x)}^{g2(x)}f(x,y)dydx\] \[\int_{0}^{1}\int_{x^3}^{x^\frac{1}{2}}xy dydx\]

So, the aproximated volume was 0.1328 cubic units and the actual volume is 0.1041 cubix units. I chose these functions because it would be contained within a 1x1.5 cubic inch volume for easy scaling (in this case no need to scale at all) in Onshape for 3-d printing and representation. I also like that the numbers were small and easy to work with once you wrap your head around how small the region really is. It adds depth and understanding beyond what I've ever known when we look at that region in all 3 planes and incoorperate a function containing x and y terms. We've all seen or could imagine this region on a graph, but the actual scale of it is so much smaller than it seems in a 2-d plane, which is why I like it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Double Integrals over Regions

Introduction Over the semester we've looked at many topics and created 3D models. For this we are going to revisit an old topic, double integrals over a region. In this we found the volume of a surface in the xyz-plane bounded by two curves. From the many topics I chose to revisit this topic. I have a couple reason to why I chose to redo this. First, the model did not print correctly. The print added spaces between the rectangular prisms. Another reason was that I think the surface and curves did not represent the topic entirely. The surface I chose just increased between the curves. Improvements When making the model on Onshape there were no spaces between the rectangles, which can be seen on the right. However, when printing this spaces were being added. The second issue was with the surface I chose which was \(f(x,y)=xy+x\). This function only increased over the two curves I chose \begin{align*} f(x) &= \sqrt{x} ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Septoil Knot

Knots are a very interesting topic and a field that has not quite been fully discovered, so mathematicians are still discovering new ideas and invariances about knots even today. While it may seem like knots are a simple skill you learn at camp, they actually have a lot of mathematical properties and in this blog post we are going to look at just a few. By mathematical definition, a knot is a closed curve in three dimensional space that does not intersect itself. Since we are working with three dimensional space and you are reading this on a two dimensional screen, we need a way to look at knots in two dimensions and that is where knot projections come in. A knot projection is simply a picture of a knot in two dimensions and where a knot crosses itself in the projection is simply a crossing of that projection. The number of crossings of a knot is the smallest number of crossings among all projections of a knot. Since a knot is not necessarily solid, one...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knot 10-84

Introduction In mathematics, a knot is simply a closed loop. The simplest version of this is the unknot, which is a just a closed circle (imagine a ponytail holder). Knots, however, quickly become more complicated than this more basic example. This post will examine a particular knot (knot 10-84) and a few of its knot invariants. Crossing Number Knots are often defined by their crossing number, which is the number of times the knot’s strands cross each other. As indicated in its name, knot 10-84 is a 10 crossing knot. In order to visualize the knot, we can look at its knot projection, in which the knot is represented by a line segment broken only at its undercrossings: Tricolorability Now that we’ve looked at knot crossings, we will examine a potential property of knots: tricolorability. In order to understand tricolorability, it is first important to know that one strand of a knot is defined as an unbroken line segment in the knot p...
Post a Comment
Read more