Skip to main content

Approximating a Solid by Rectangular Prisms

About integration for a function defined on a region

If a solid can be modeled by an integrable function of two variables over a general region in the plane, we can use integration to find the volume of the solid. Let’s consider a region \(D\) on the \(x-y\) plane, which is bounded by two vertical lines and two functions of \(x\). The two vertical lines are \(x=a\) and \(x=b\) respectively, and the two functions of \(x\) is \(y=u(x)\) and \(y=v(x)\). The integrable function is \(f(x,y)\). The integration to find the volume of the solid can be calculated as following: \[V=\int^b_a{\int^{v(x)}_{u(x)}{f(x,y)dy}dx}\] The double integral \(\int^{b}_{a}{\int^{v(x)}_{u(x)}{f(x,y)dy}dx}\) of positive \(f(x,y)\) can be regarded as the volume under the surface \(z=f(x,y)\) over the region \(D\). We can use the Riemann sum to approximate the integral: \[\sum_{i,j}{f(x_i,y_j)}\Delta x \Delta y \] Each term in the Riemann sum is the volume of a thin box with base \(\Delta x \times \Delta y \) and height \( f(x_i,y_j)\).

The solid to be analyzed

The function we chose is a hyperbolic paraboloid. The surface defined by the hyperbolic paraboloid is also called saddle, as it is visually similar to a saddle for horse-riding. The hyperbolic paraboloid function is defined by \[z=f(x,y)=1+2x^2-2y^2\]
The region on the \(x-y\) plane is bounded by two vertical lines and two functions of \(x\). The two vertical lines are \(x=-0.6\) and \(x=0.6\) respectively, and the two functions \(y=u(x)\) and \(y=v(x)\) are hyperbolas: \[ y=u(x)=-\sqrt{0.28+x^2}, -0.6 \le x \le 0.6\] \[ y=v(x)=\sqrt{0.28+x^2}, -0.6 \le x \le 0.6\]
The solid can be defined by the saddle surface and the bounded region as the following picture shows:
This solid was chosen for the following reasons:
1. The function of the saddle surface has a concise form, so that we can focus on the concept of approximating the volume by double integral. The saddle surface we chose is not only important from the mathematical point of view, but also popular such as a saddle for horse riding in our daily lives. The Gaussian curvature, which is the product of the two principal curvatures \(Κ = κ_1κ_2\), is negative for a saddle shaped surface.
2. The region on the \(x-y \) plane is not a simple rectangle, but a somewhat irregular region bounded by two vertical lines and hyperbolas. By using numerical approximation, i.e. the Riemann sum, we can easily calculate the volume of the solid over the region.
The functions we chose made a shape with irregular surface and base region. This helps us to understand the concept and the calculation process of using the double integral to find the volume of the solid.

Compute the volume of approximation

We can compute the volume of solid approximated by rectangular prisms. The calculation process is shown in the following table
From the table, the volume of approximation \(V'\) is 1.488 cubic inches.
The 3D shape of the approximation is shown in the following picture:
If more rectangle prisms are used, it is possible to get more accurate approximation.

Compute the actual volume

The actual volume can be calculated by double integration: \[V=\int^{-0.6}_{0.6}{\int^{\sqrt{0.28+x^2}}_{-\sqrt{0.28+x^2}}{(1+2x^2-2y^2)dy}dx}=1.493\] The actual volume of the solid is 1.493 cubic inches. The difference between the approximated volume and the accurate volume is \( \Delta V= |V-V'|=1.493-1.488=0.005\) cubic inches. The relative error is \( \frac{\Delta V}{V}= 0.005/1.493 ≈ 0.33\% \).
From the above example, we can better understand the concept and the numerical approximation of the double integral of a function over a region on a plane.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Knot 9-31

Knot 9-31 A knot is mathematics is defined as a closed, non-self-intersecting curve that is placed in three dimensions and cannot be the "unknot". The main difference between a knot in the real world and a known in mathematics is that a knot in mathematics does not contain any extra strands. The example following will help visualize this. Today, I have specifically chosen knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot is very unique and contains some very interesting properties that we are going to look into. The Crossing Number For my knot today, I chose knot 9-31 from the Knot Atlas. This knot contains 9 crossings! The Unknotting Number The unknotting number is exactly what is sounds like. This is the minimum number of times the knot must be passed through itself to untie it. Luckily, the Knot Atlas is super useful and provides the unknotting number for us, but I still...

Do Over: Integration for Over Regions in the Plane

Introduction Earlier in the semester, we visited the topic of integration for over region regions in the plane. This was our first experience with taking integration in the third dimension. To do this, we had to use double integrals to calculate the volume of a region between two surfaces. This topic seems relatively straightforward and anyone who has taken a higher calculus class knows of double integrals. Today, we are going to revisit this topic for a couple of reasons. Why Double Integrals Again? As mentioned before, I am revisiting this topic for a couple of reasons. One of the main reasons is due to how the 3D print turned out. Due to the function, I chose, the final rectangular prism was stand alone. When printing, this resulted in a sloppy prism that lacked structural integrity. The image below is a reference to my original design that includes the prism that had the issue. The main cause of ...