Skip to main content

Approximating a Solid by Rectangular Prisms

About integration for a function defined on a region

If a solid can be modeled by an integrable function of two variables over a general region in the plane, we can use integration to find the volume of the solid. Let’s consider a region \(D\) on the \(x-y\) plane, which is bounded by two vertical lines and two functions of \(x\). The two vertical lines are \(x=a\) and \(x=b\) respectively, and the two functions of \(x\) is \(y=u(x)\) and \(y=v(x)\). The integrable function is \(f(x,y)\). The integration to find the volume of the solid can be calculated as following: \[V=\int^b_a{\int^{v(x)}_{u(x)}{f(x,y)dy}dx}\] The double integral \(\int^{b}_{a}{\int^{v(x)}_{u(x)}{f(x,y)dy}dx}\) of positive \(f(x,y)\) can be regarded as the volume under the surface \(z=f(x,y)\) over the region \(D\). We can use the Riemann sum to approximate the integral: \[\sum_{i,j}{f(x_i,y_j)}\Delta x \Delta y \] Each term in the Riemann sum is the volume of a thin box with base \(\Delta x \times \Delta y \) and height \( f(x_i,y_j)\).

The solid to be analyzed

The function we chose is a hyperbolic paraboloid. The surface defined by the hyperbolic paraboloid is also called saddle, as it is visually similar to a saddle for horse-riding. The hyperbolic paraboloid function is defined by \[z=f(x,y)=1+2x^2-2y^2\]
The region on the \(x-y\) plane is bounded by two vertical lines and two functions of \(x\). The two vertical lines are \(x=-0.6\) and \(x=0.6\) respectively, and the two functions \(y=u(x)\) and \(y=v(x)\) are hyperbolas: \[ y=u(x)=-\sqrt{0.28+x^2}, -0.6 \le x \le 0.6\] \[ y=v(x)=\sqrt{0.28+x^2}, -0.6 \le x \le 0.6\]
The solid can be defined by the saddle surface and the bounded region as the following picture shows:
This solid was chosen for the following reasons:
1. The function of the saddle surface has a concise form, so that we can focus on the concept of approximating the volume by double integral. The saddle surface we chose is not only important from the mathematical point of view, but also popular such as a saddle for horse riding in our daily lives. The Gaussian curvature, which is the product of the two principal curvatures \(Κ = κ_1κ_2\), is negative for a saddle shaped surface.
2. The region on the \(x-y \) plane is not a simple rectangle, but a somewhat irregular region bounded by two vertical lines and hyperbolas. By using numerical approximation, i.e. the Riemann sum, we can easily calculate the volume of the solid over the region.
The functions we chose made a shape with irregular surface and base region. This helps us to understand the concept and the calculation process of using the double integral to find the volume of the solid.

Compute the volume of approximation

We can compute the volume of solid approximated by rectangular prisms. The calculation process is shown in the following table
From the table, the volume of approximation \(V'\) is 1.488 cubic inches.
The 3D shape of the approximation is shown in the following picture:
If more rectangle prisms are used, it is possible to get more accurate approximation.

Compute the actual volume

The actual volume can be calculated by double integration: \[V=\int^{-0.6}_{0.6}{\int^{\sqrt{0.28+x^2}}_{-\sqrt{0.28+x^2}}{(1+2x^2-2y^2)dy}dx}=1.493\] The actual volume of the solid is 1.493 cubic inches. The difference between the approximated volume and the accurate volume is \( \Delta V= |V-V'|=1.493-1.488=0.005\) cubic inches. The relative error is \( \frac{\Delta V}{V}= 0.005/1.493 ≈ 0.33\% \).
From the above example, we can better understand the concept and the numerical approximation of the double integral of a function over a region on a plane.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Approximation of a Solid of Revolution

Most math teachers I've had have been able to break down Calculus into two very broad categories: derivatives and integrals. What is truly amazing, is how much you can do with these two tools. By using integration, it is possible to approximate the shape of a 2-D function that is rotated around an axis. This solid created from the rotation is known as a solid of revolution. To explain this concept, we will take a look at the region bounded by the two functions: \[ f(x) = 2^{.25x} - 1 \] and \[ g(x) = e^{.25x} - 1 \] bounded at the line y = 1. This region is meant to represent a cross section of a small bowl. While it may not perfectly represent this practical object, the approximation will be quite textured, and will provide insight into how the process works. The region bounded by the two functions can be rotated around the y-axis to create a fully solid object. This is easy enough to talk about, but what exactly does this new solid look like? Is...
8 comments
Read more

Solids of Revolution Revisited

Introduction In my previous blog post on solids of revolution, we looked at the object formed by rotating the area between \(f(x) = -\frac{1}{9}x^2+\frac{3}{4} \) and \( g(x)=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}e^{-x} \) around the \( x \) axis and bounded by \( x = 0 \) and \( x = 1.5 \). When this solid is approximated using 10 washers, the resulting object looks like this: When I was looking back over the 3D prints I’d created for this course, I noticed that the print for this example was the least interesting of the bunch. Looking at the print now, I feel like the shape is rather uninteresting. The curve I chose has such a gradual slope that each of the washers are fairly similar in size and causes the overall shape to just look like a cylinder. Since calculating the changes in the radiuses of the washers is a big part of the washer method, I don’t think this slowly decreasing curve was the best choice to illustrate the concept. The reason I had done this o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Finding the Center of Mass of a Toy Boat

Consider two people who visit the gym a substantial amount. One is a girl who loves to lift weights and bench press as much as she possibly can. The other is a guy who focuses much more on his legs, trying to break the world record for squat weight. It just so happens that these two are the same height and have the exact same weight, but the center of their weight is not in the same part of their body. This is because the girl has much more weight in the top half of her body and the boy has more weight in the bottom half. This difference in center of mass is a direct result of the different distributions of mass throughout both of their bodies. Moments and Mass There are two main components to finding the center of mass of an object. The first, unsurprisingly, is the mass of the whole object. In this case of the boat example, the mass will be uniform throughout the entire object. This is ideal a majority of the time as it drastically reduces the difficulty...
Post a Comment
Read more