Skip to main content

Solids of Revolution: The Washer Method

 

Introduction

Imagine for a moment that you work for a chocolate factory and help to create new treats. You’re very good at your job and have developed a design for a new candy consisting of a chocolate shell with a caramel-filled cavity. You want the outside of the shell to be 1.5 inches tall and have the same curve as the equation \( f(x)=- \frac{1}{9}\ x^2+ \frac{3}{4}\ \). You also need there to be an opening in the center for the filling, which you want to have the same curve as \( g(x)= \frac{1}{2}\ - \frac{1}{2}\ e^{-x} \). There’s only one problem: before you can begin manufacturing your masterpiece, your boss wants to know what the volume of this candy is so he can order the correct amount of chocolate. Is there a way to calculate the volume of such a complicated shape? Fortunately, there is, with a little help from calculus.

What is the Washer Method?

As discussed above, we know the wall of our solid will consist of the space between the following two curves. Since it must be 1.5 inches tall, we will only look at the interval \( 0 \leq x \leq 1.5 \):

Imagine rotating the area between these curves around the x-axis – that would give us the solid we are trying to create! The washer method is a way to calculate the volume of such a solid by dividing it into disks (or washers in this case, since there is a hole in the middle) and adding up the volumes of those disks. First we'll use the washer method to get an estimate of our shape’s volume by dividing our solid into 10 washers. Since our interval is 1.5 inches long, this means that each washer will have the following height: \[ h=1.5 \div 10=0.15 \ \textrm{inches} \]

For our first washer, we start at \( x=0 \). At this point, the distance from the center to the outer wall (in other words, the outer radius) is: \( f(x)=- \frac{1}{9}\ (0)^2+ \frac{3}{4}\ = \frac{3}{4}\ \) inches wide. Similarly, the hole at the center has a radius of \( g(x)= \frac{1}{2}\ - \frac{1}{2}\ e^0=0 \) inches. This means our first washer is a disk of radius 0.75 inches with a hole of radius 0 inches. This is a cylinder we can easily compute the volume of: \[ V_1=( \pi (0.75)^2 \cdot 0.15)-( \pi (0)^2 \cdot 0.15)=0.265 \ \textrm{in}^2 \]

That’s one washer done. By following the same steps, we can compute the volume for all 10 washers along our interval:

By creating these washers, we’ve developed an approximation of our solid that looks like the model below. The model is 1.5 inches tall at its tallest point and 1.5 inches wide at its widest point:

Now we can simply add these up to get the total volume! Doing this, we get \( 1.898 \ \textrm{inches}^2 \). Remember, however, that this is not the exact volume because the edges of the solid above are not smooth exacltly like our equations- it is an approximation.

Applying the Washer Method

So far, we have an estimate of our solid’s volume. We know that the more washers we use to calculate the volume, the more accurate our calculations will be since they will follow the curve of our equations more closely. As you know, integrating a function over an interval is like adding an infinite number of rectangles to calculate the area beneath the function. Thus, we can do the same thing for our solid by using integration in our equation for the volume of a washer.

Therefore, the equation we used earlier to calculate the volume of one washer \[ V= \pi R^2h- \pi r^2h= \pi h(R^2-r^2) \] becomes \[ V= \pi \int_{a}^{b} (R^2-r^2) \,dx \] where \( R \) represents the radius for the outer edge and \( r \) represents the radius for the inner cavity on the interval \( a \leq x \leq b \) .

Using this equation on our example from before, we get the following integral: \[ \pi \int_{0}^{1.5} (f(x)^2-g(x)^2) \,dx = \pi \int_{0}^{1.5} \Big( (- \frac{1}{9}\ x^2+ \frac{3}{4}\ )^2-( \frac{1}{2}\ - \frac{1}{2}\ e^{-x})^2 \Big) \,dx \] All that’s left to do is evaluate the integral. \[ \pi \int_{0}^{1.5} \Big( \frac{1}{81}\ x^3- \frac{1}{6}\ x^2+ \frac{9}{16}\ -( \frac{1}{4}\ - \frac{1}{2}\ e^{-x}+ \frac{1}{4}\ e^{-2x}) \Big) \,dx \] \[ = \pi \int_{0}^{1.5} \Big( \frac{1}{81}\ x^3- \frac{1}{6}\ x^2+ \frac{5}{16}\ + \frac{1}{2}\ e^{-x}- \frac{1}{4}\ e^{-2x} \Big) \,dx \] \[ \pi \Big[ \frac{1}{405}\ x^4- \frac{1}{18}\ x^3+ \frac{5}{16}\ x- \frac{1}{2}\ e^{-x}+ \frac{1}{8}\ e^{-2x} \Big] \] \[ \pi \bigg[ \frac{(1.5)^4}{405}\ - \frac{(1.5)^3}{18}\ + \frac{5(1.5)}{16}\ - \frac{1}{2}\ e^{-1.5}+ \frac{1}{8}\ e^{-3}- \Big( \frac{0^4}{405}\ - \frac{0^3}{18}\ + \frac{5(0)}{16}\ - \frac{1}{2}\ e^0+ \frac{1}{8}\ e^0 \Big) \bigg] \] \[ =1.7896 \]

Therefore, we have determined that the volume of our solid is \( 1.7896 \ \textrm{in}^2 \) and can tell our boss exactly what volume of chocolate we need to make our candy.

Why These Functions?

The functions used in the preceding example were chosen for three primary reasons. The first and most salient of these reasons is the functions have interesting behavior that reinforces the learner’s understanding of the material. Compared to linear functions, the curving path of these functions allow the learner to observe the relationship between the functions and the changing widths of the washers on both the inside and outside of the model. Furthermore, both of the functions have steeper slopes at some point along the integral (for \( f(x) \) this increases with \( x \) and for \( g(x) \) this decreases with \( x \) ) which allows the learner to observe the relationship between the slope and the changes in the sizes of the washers. Secondly, these functions together produce a shape that students could reasonably imagine being a chocolate candy. This makes the material more approachable by providing a model of something that could (with a little imagination) serve a real-world purpose. Lastly, these functions result in an equation that is easy to integrate, making the example accessible to students who don’t remember (or struggled with) more advanced integration techniques. Thus, the example uses math that is not trivial while still keeping the focus on the new method.

Author: Sarah Bombrys

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Over: Integration Over a Region in a Plane

Throughout the semester we have covered a variety of topics and how their mathematical orientation applies to real world scenarios. One topic we discussed, and I would like to revisit, is integration over a region in a plane which involves calculating a double integral. Integrating functions of two variables allows us to calculate the volume under the function in a 3D space. You can see a more in depth description and my previous example in my blog post, https://ukyma391.blogspot.com/2021/09/integration-for-over-regions-in-plane_27.html . I want to revisit this topic because in my previous attempt my volume calculations were incorrect, and my print lacked structural stability. I believed this print and calculation was the topic I could most improve on and wanted to give it another chance. What needed Improvement? The function used previously was f(x) = cos(xy) bounded on [-3,3] x [-1,3]. After solving for the estimated and actual volume, it was difficult to represent in a print...

Minimal Surfaces

Minimum surfaces can be described in many equivalent ways. Today, we are going to focus on minimum surfaces by defining it using curvature. A surface is a minimum surface if and only if the mean curvature at every point is zero. This means that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite curvature allowing the smallest surface area possible to form. Curvature helps define a minimal surface by looking at the normal vector. For a surface in R 3 , there is a tangent plane at each point. At each point in the surface, there is a normal vector perpendicular to the tangent plane. Then, we can intersect any plane that contains the normal vector with the surface to get a curve. Therefore, the mean curvature of a surface is defined by the following equation. Where theta is an angle from a starting plane that contains the normal vector. For this week’s project, we will be demonstrating minimum surfaces with a frame and soap bubbles! How It Works Minimum surfac...

Do Over: Ruled Surfaces

Why to choose this project to repeat For the do over project, I would like to choose the ruled surfaces. I don't think my last project was creative, and the 3D printed effect was not very satisfactory. In the previous attempts, all the lines are connected between a straight line and a circle. This connection structure is relatively uncomplicated. The printed model has too many lines, resulting in too dense line arrangement. The gaps between lines are too small, and the final effect is that all the lines are connected into a curved surface, which is far from the effect I expected. What to be improved In this do over project, I would like to improve in two aspects. Firstly, a different ruled surface is chosen. In the previous model, one curve is a unit circle on the \(x-y\) plane, and the ruled surface is a right circular conoid. In this do over project, it is replaced by two border lines. Each borderline is in the shape of an isosceles right triangl...